Jump to content

jozzafunk

Members
  • Content Count

    342
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About jozzafunk

  • Rank
    RDA avoider
  • Birthday 11/09/1975

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    joelanssmith
  • Website URL
    http://joelanscombesmith.wordpress.com/

Profile Information

  • Location
    Wellington
  • Interests
    Music
    Recording Sound
    Swinging Boom
    Sound Editing and sound mixing stuff
    Eating
    Fishing
    Whiskey
  • Interested in Sound for Picture
    Yes
  • About
    Love recording good sound - Especially doco in unusual locations - also love sound editing

Recent Profile Visitors

2,017 profile views
  1. jozzafunk

    Zoom F8n.

    I have neither so can't really comment sorry - tho have been using a 633 almost daily since they arrived in New Zealand, and find it to be superb - reliable / user friendly mostly / great upgrades / light / well specced If you want my 2 cents about those 2 - hard to say - 664 would cover most, if not all jobs I deal with - the additional options the 688 dsp provides don't seem worth the price difference but if you doing reality / panels regularly dugen would be invaluable I would say and I'd guess would pay for itself in a few days
  2. jozzafunk

    AATON Cantar Mini VS. Sonosax SX-R4+

    Interesting test - fairly apparent differences even just on the laptop, but very difficult to be objective - the Sonosax sounds so 3D!!
  3. jozzafunk

    NAB 2018 Products update

    Seems to be fairly large difference between the 2 just on the lappy speakers - not much bottom end on the me2, probably more lav than tx/rx, me2 1/4 of price of mke2
  4. jozzafunk

    Zoom F8n.

    Not at all, it's not rocket science, some stuff is better than other stuff, if you've got the option you use the better stuff - there's no point arguing subjectivity, that's what kicked off this conversation in the first place.
  5. jozzafunk

    Zoom F8n.

    What is your point? As I read it you were inferred a renowned recording artist recorded vox on lo-fi cheap gear, however you were completely mistaken, so er, what was the point being made? Anybody can use anything to do some sort of job, a pro / craftsperson will use the best gear they can. 633 preamps are better than f8 preamps / the difference is a very apparent difference that counts to a few people initially and many more down the line whether they know it or not / If you don't think initial quality counts you either have low production values, poor hearing, poor monitoring or haven't done much post mixing / they are also more expensive / you get what you pay for / technology is changing, you get more for less, not necessarily a good thing / there's a good reason vinyl is having a resurgence .... IMHO ( except for pre quality matter, that's just a fact ) I'll probably get a f8n as backup / extra tracks, but I would much rather 788 / 688 / nomad
  6. jozzafunk

    SD 633 X3/X4 question

    it'sin the outputs routing menu, green is post fade / blue is pre or something like that Says it on the page
  7. jozzafunk

    Burnout, stress, depression: experiences?

    When I first started in the industry about 12-13 years ago I worked for about the first 2 years in a busy production office without really having a lunch break - I broke down after a while and became really angry and sad and had to take 6 weeks off to stare out the window. It was an amazing experience that I value to this day - I learnt a lot about myself and where my 'edges' were. It's good to know ones limits, there's possibly better ways of discovering them
  8. jozzafunk

    DPA 4098 - first impressions

    Last rig I did I ran cables to a 302 and sent line level to my bag, I'm using 4099s tho I think they're lower sensitivity.
  9. jozzafunk

    Delivering files from multiple recorders

    Beauty - thank you sir - this is very useful
  10. jozzafunk

    Lectrosonics SMWB coming soon?

    oh there we go - I'll defer to Phil on this one - I've got a few complaints about premiere pro exports myself!
  11. jozzafunk

    Lectrosonics SMWB coming soon?

    Protools ( and I imagine pretty much all audio post software ) has settings to convert all ingested files to same sample rate/bit depth automatically and/or supports mixed formats anyways - it's kinda a non-issue if you ask me
  12. jozzafunk

    For the Whisky drinkers

    There's nothin' quite like the depth found in certain aged cask strengths - Coming to the bottom of a Adelphi Caol Illa - outrageous stuff - too easy to drink
  13. jozzafunk

    For the Whisky drinkers

    80 proof is 40% alcohol - anything above from that is better with a drop of water anyways
  14. You're asking in the context of getting a feed to your cart/bag for your own reference tho hey?
×