John Blankenship

Members
  • Content count

    6,444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About John Blankenship

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.indyfilm.com/

Profile Information

  • Location
    Indianapolis
  • Interested in Sound for Picture
    Yes
  • About
    Hello.

Recent Profile Visitors

4,708 profile views
  1. no
  2. Yet the Deva 4, 5, 5.8, & 16 series still performs beautifully and, IMHO, they remain one of the best cart recorders available -- now at bargain prices on the used market. This series has been around a long time now, and even though I too would love some minor firmware updates, these machines boast some awesome features and functions that no other currently available recorder on the planet does -- at any price! Word is that the soon to be released Deva 24 will take these and other features to a whole new level. And even in the world of those tantalizing new attractions, I expect my current Deva to still perform its cutting edge functions well into the future.
  3. From what I understand the Bose noise-cancelling units are way ahead of others. They sound really good for music and once you're used to them (true about all headphones, of course), they perform well for our application also. I like them for NFL gigs because they're much more compact than the Remote Audio HNs and I also use them on the plane when traveling. For location dialog I start with the Ultrasones and switch to the RA HNs when I need the extra isolation. I switched from the 7506s when years ago I did a live streaming event that required mixing a musical group in real time and I simply couldn't hear the mix the way I needed to with the Sonys. I pulled out my Etymotic in-ear units to finish that gig and added Ultrasones to my sonic arsenal soon thereafter.
  4. I could probably send you 7.57 if that will help (I don't recall it having a "T" though). Let me know via PM if you need me to send it tomorrow afternoon when I get back to the studio.
  5. A big +4 for Pete's work (3 CMCs and an 816)
  6. I find the Ultrasone HFI-680 a bit more bulky than Sonys, but not by enough that it matters. Much bulkier than either are the Remote Audio High Noise cans (which use Sony 7506 drivers). When I need to isolate better what I'm hearing, the RAs are often a good choice. Another option is the Bose noise-cancelling phones. They're lightweight, comfortable, and sound really good -- even though they're not as accurate overall as the Ultrasones. A well-established successful mixer that I know and respect has used Bose for years and loves them. I've been using them for NFL game day action, and once they become familiar, they're a good choice for knocking out a lot of background gibberish. I also use the Bose for plane travel.
  7. I'm confused as to why you're confused. The Micplexer has a 35mHz receiving window. With the original Micplexer, each unit was designed for a specific Zaxcom block. With the Micplexer 2, you can adjust it for which block you want, or you can tune a 35mHz receiving window between blocks if you wish. FWIW, here is some info on the original Mixplexer: https://zaxcom.com/products/micplexer/
  8. Only if the frequencies are within a 35mHz window -- not too likely in this case.
  9. Word has it that the government compensation figure for replacing my 600mHz wireless will be twice as much as I received for my 700mHz systems.
  10. Based on their name they may be mythical.
  11. I like that video a lot -- thanks, Jim, for posting it. As the incessant stream of newbies shows up asking what gear they should buy in order to undercut our rates, we should immediately direct them to this video which contains everything they need to learn to be a consummate pro.
  12. On the newest Red how can it be balanced if you're inputting two channels? The Epic has the two separate audio jacks (on either side of the front), but the newer Weapon series has just a single TRS mini jack (now on the rear) accommodating both channels.
  13. On the newer Reds I'm familiar with, the inputs depend upon which I/O module (if any) they have. For instance, the Pro I/O module sports a 5-pin Lemo for time code and XLRs for audio. They also have several other optional I/O modules with different connections. I think natively the newer Reds still use a 4-pin 00 Lemo and the audio input is now an unbalanced 3-pin mini-phone jack. Someone please speak up if the above isn't totally correct. This is based upon limited knowledge and only a tad of experience with the newest Reds. Worth noting is that I encountered an egregious problem -- possibly a ground loop issue -- when I powered an RX200 from an attached P-Tap on one of the newest Reds. Switching to internal batteries in the RX200 solved the issue, but I've not encountered such a problem with any other camera -- even the earlier Reds.
  14. Thanks, Larry, for correcting me. I didn't realize that there was that much isolation with a passive splitter. Please be careful, folks, which you use though, as some splitters -- especially the cheaper ones -- are more of the simple T adapter design. In choosing one, I would go with Larry's recommendations, especially the Lectro one.
  15. No, not the 4062, it's seldom a good choice for our work. The 4062 is a super low sensitivity version and is only suitable for dialog if you're wiring a screamer. You're probably thinking of the 4061 and 4063 (they're the same sensitivity; the 4063 is a low voltage version) and are suitable for dialog, as are the 4060 that you use.