Mungo

Members
  • Content count

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mungo

  • Rank
    Hero Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Germany
  • About
    ENG, EFP, Sound mixing post

Recent Profile Visitors

1,634 profile views
  1. PSC has been redesigning the six pack to make the Sennheiser EK6042 fit in. A new version will be released in about two months. Maybe with some other improvements...
  2. Sennheiser EK 6042 Sony DWX-N Sony UWP-D (URX series) Audio Ltd. En2 CX2
  3. Cheaper wireless and that Røde stuff is much more a Job Killer than Automixer in my opinion. As a 633 user I was not familiar at all with this feature and now I tried it out: You need proper signals, proper gain and the knowledge which channels have to be in Automix and which not. And everytime you have to judge by listening if that mix makes sense or not. Otherwise your mix will probably end up in a horrible mess. It's rather a tool. So I think that "Automix" is the wrong word for it.
  4. You can select different line levels by that menu item. But it's not Mic level and not further adjustable.
  5. X1 and X2 are single symmetrical outputs and Tape Out is a 2ch left/right non-symmetrical output with a different level. Although they look the same, they are completely different.
  6. And how about TRIM on inputs 4 to 6 to +22dB?
  7. No sorry, that is of course not correct. I meant carrier instead of bandwith. Oh dear.
  8. + 1 for LSP 500. Very useful tool for many situations. You can also use it for playback in the field to or as a live monitor...
  9. Digital transmitters emit a constant RF stream all over their bandwith. So they interfere more than the FM analogue ones.
  10. Yes, that's what I meant. Depends on director and talents. There are productions in which even I would never do it. I spoke of really serious problems like a lav having fallen off while boom is out of reach, breakdown of sound gear, constant heavy RF issues. And of course productions where there's no ADR planned and would let production costs explode. It's not about a plane or sledgehammer anybody can hear.
  11. Thank you both!
  12. Fascinating info, thanks Jeff! I will tell my students next time I'll show format examples. I'll grab a TCD-D10 out of the cellar and say: "Ghost - Nachricht von Sam (that's the German title) was recorded on this." They will be stunned!
  13. Wow, Michael! Everything in one rucksack - that's kind of great concept! If you upgrade to a 633 or Max you can do almost anything up to three lavs with this one bag. What is the blue box in the middle? It has a BNC connector and an 1/4 TRS.
  14. Narrow band receivers allow filters which are more precise. That's physics. But today everybody wants and needs universal broadband receivers - that's why an old UCR210 or Sennheiser 3041 for example will probably perform better in that category. But newer receivers often perform better in precise tuning, so "it depends" if they will really do a worse job in RF crowded situations.
  15. Well nobody I know, including me, used to understand that concept at once. :-D I guess they searched for a way to one-man-crew having some audio value visible in that viewfinder and being able to change it without grabbing around the head.