Jump to content

Constantin

Members
  • Posts

    4,696
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

Posts posted by Constantin

  1. On 2/1/2024 at 12:03 PM, Donald Kauffman said:

    Lectro have never found a way to do this outside of the US...

    They would have found a way, but as a US company they are still under the patent restraints, regardless of where they manufacture. 
    In the case with Sound Devices I‘m surprised they can still do this as they purchased Audio Ltd several years ago

  2. 9 hours ago, DHB said:

    Late to the party, but I just got an F8. Yes, it's a shame that the FRC-8 was dropped ..but the Bluetooth-connected iPad solid-state version of the same thing is just wonderful! ..Nothing physical or mechanical, to get snapped off, or caught up, or taking up space.

     

    The only thing lacking - or perhaps I haven't quite got the hang of it - is that there's no audio-to-cans via the BT connection. That's the only let down.


    That‘s a good thing. Bluetooth audio is always late to the party, too ;)

     I always prefer actual hardware controls over virtual faders. It’s one of the reasons I even got into this job in the first place. The feel and aura of all the actual hardware of things. That’s why I immediately bought the CL-16, for example. 
    But it’s great to have the iPad option, like in a car to car situation.  And I used an ipad on a sailboat, mostly to keep the other gear away from any potential water damage

  3. I too have read reports about MGs long repair times, but I have not heard that the mics need to be repaired more frequently than mics from other manufacturers. 
     

    I‘m surprised people need such a long time to come up with their own modular mic systems. Schoeps have been doing it for such a long time, and Neumann as well, to an extent, and with such success that I‘m really curious why it’s only catching on now. 
    And by now I mean the last 20 years or so, with Sennheiser and DPA getting into it a while ago, and now others catching up. 

  4. On 1/9/2024 at 7:15 PM, borjam said:


    I mean, does it have converters capable of delivering a dynamic range greater than 24 bit?

    As I understand it the converters themselves don’t need dynamic range greater than 24 bits, as they basically shift the reference point around to accommodate louder sounds. So the range stays the same, but the 0dBfs moves around. 
    Still the converters do need to be able to facilitate this

    On 1/7/2024 at 3:22 AM, Michael Capulli said:

    I don't believe the X3 has dual ADCs and to my ears you dont get any more headroom when using 32 bit float. 

    I always thought the Cantar did have dual ADCs. But Aaton has never been very open about their specs

  5. On 1/6/2024 at 6:12 PM, Patrick Tresch said:

    True but how long? Some allready use automix and it won’t get better with ai entering the field. 

    While you are making valid points I am curious why you think that 32-bit float of all things would negate the need for mixing? 

  6. 5 hours ago, Izen Ears said:

    "Bored" does not describe your reaction. I'm curious what your problem is (you didn't mention it), and why you felt the need to dive bomb into this thread with weird negative energy.

    You did not get what my problem is from the very post you quoted? 

    Like I said, I detest these posts and photos, hence the negative energy. I just don’t like topics where the sole purpose appears to be to highlight a colleague’s bad work day. Sure, the OP also asked about the mic, but when I asked him to clarify what his post was about, it didn’t really sound like he didn’t know what I meant. 
     

  7. 6 hours ago, leo153 said:

    Eeeeeesh lighten up friend... There is no "to what end", just a light hearted post.


    Well, you may find it light hearted, but the person who rigged that mic might not see it that way. His off day rig displayed here among a group of peers. There’s a group on Facebook that has a lot of these posts, and I detest them by now. At first, I shared Olles sentiment about the high end show people making the same mistakes as the low end folks, but by now I find these posts really really boring. 
    anyway, if it makes you feel any better, post away. 

  8. I‘m uncertain about the purpose of this topic. Is it to enquire about the mic used or it to show that the mic shows? If it’s the latter I fail to see what’s so special about this one. I’m sure most of us here could post hundreds if not thousands of these kinds of mic showings, but to what end?

  9. On 11/22/2023 at 12:21 AM, RadoStefanov said:

    100% DPA microdot user.

    Never a single issue. IMHO they are indestructible. DOnt know about knock offs

     

    Same. I actually tend to leave the adapter on the transmitter at all times and always unscrew the MicroDot. So far all good 

  10. Here in Germany it’s been ok. Whenever I‘ve had an issue I have gone through local distributor who either repaired things themselves or sent them to Denmark. 
    They replaced a C preamp under warranty and an entire 4017 which had suffered from water damage. So I am quite happy with their support. 
    I just wish they would use more words. On social media there are no reps as far as I know (except for this one guy from Belgium) and when they do repair something (or not) they don’t contact me prior. They just send everything back without further comment. 

  11. 17 minutes ago, RadoStefanov said:

    Mine sounds fine. Nothing out of the ordinary. If anything the pianisimo with big fur is touch muffled

     
    Hence my advice to take the fur off when possible. A Pianissimo without a fur sounds on par or maybe slightly better than a Cosi - to my ears anyway. 

    Cosi does sound fine and it’s the best solution for indoor and lots of of outdoor situations. But a mic with just the stock foam or naked still sounds better. 

  12. 2 hours ago, Derek H said:

    Yes, that’s a fair assessment. The piano is a commitment to strong outdoor wind protection. It doesn’t have a quick way to get the shell off and just use it as a mount. But if you can try out their Cosi product you might like that for indoors and out. 


    Yes, the Cosi is a must-have product, no doubt. 
    However, it still muffles the sound a little bit, so if you’re moving in and out quickly, with potentially szrong wind, I would probably prefer to use a Pianissimo and just take off/put on the fur, as that is really easy and fast to do

  13. 10 hours ago, Fred Salles said:

    Interesting point. You mean the length of the tube and the number of slots and their positions are the same on the MiniCMIT and the CMIT5

    Yes, I am pretty sure they are exactly the same. However, I mostly work with my DPA and here you can literally take the interference tube from the long preamp and screw it onto the short preamp. So they are exactly the same. 
     

    for a while, I used to go from a super cardioid (like the Schoeps MK41) to a shotgun mic (in my case the Neumann KMR82), because I felt the short tube wouldn’t offer any benefit over the other two. 
    Nowadays, to be honest, I mostly use the 41, even on wides, where I tend to lean heavily on the wires, and where no mic can reach anyway, regardless of length. Getting closer, I‘ll stay on the 41, but I‘ll keep the wires away. I‘ll switch to the 4017 for sonic reasons and sometimes for a slightly more focused sound. Getting rid of noise is rarel a consideration. 

  14. Where Hugh Robjohns seems to be wrong though, is the claim that the interference tubes have reduced in size, but that’s mostly not true. In most cases, it’s the preamp segment that has been miniaturised. E.g. the  tube on the CMIT and the DPA are exactly the same lengths on the shorter and longer versions. So there’s no reason why they should perform any less well. 
    I don’t know how this works on the short Sanken mics, and others…

  15. 9 hours ago, lutzray said:

    My gizmo is, actually, a timecode generator but not LTC.


    So this is actually a cool project you got there, and you found a nice way there to bring tc (or a sync signal) into a camera that doesn’t even have an audio input other than a mic. You didn’t need to build your own box for that, but why not. But I still can’t see the advantage of the GNSS application here. Ok, it may be very precise and it may be easier and cheaper to build than a regular tc box, but in the end it generates a sync signal that all parties involved will record in some way and later it will help with automatic syncing. Cameras and editing software tend to still think in frames so your ultra-precise sync signal will still only end up to be precise down to a frame. It’s a good idea to record the signal at the beginning and at the end of the recording, but that can easily be achieved with regular tc as well. And you’re wasting a audio track, just like when cameras don’t have tc capabilities just like regular tc boxes. 
    The only advantage to your system that I can see is if manufacturers really would integrate it into their hardware. Then it could theoretically all happen automatically, although someone would still need to make sure that all devices have actually received a valid signal. And again, the same would be for any tc box integrated in to a camera. They all now have some sort of remote control feature. 
    Camera makers couldn’t be convinced for the past … I don’t how many years, to integrate proper tc circuits into their cameras, with a few exceptions. So I‘m not sure how you will fare. 
    lastly, the amount of time I spend each day thinking about and actually working on timecode is on average about 45 seconds, including recharging the boxes at night. It may be a bit more for the assistant editor, but all in all the system works pretty well. 
    So how can you improve my day by 45 seconds? 
    I really don’t mean to stifle your enthusiasm, I‘m just genuinely curious what it is you thinl you will bring to the table

  16. On 9/28/2023 at 9:58 PM, lutzray said:

    And nobody answered the original post question: Why would one uses time code if UTC timestamps are precise enough?


    In fact everyone who replied answered your question by giving you reasons why it isn’t as simply as you make it sound. 
    You do seem like a noob, though, for finding tc complicates and for thinking that we won’t need to worry about framerates anymore if only we could figure out how to sync our various devices. 
     

  17. So you want us to replace our timecode sync box with another box that can relay sync from a satellite? To me as an end-user, what’s the advantage? 
     

    fps, nd, df, etc. have nothing to do with your chosen method of syncing. 
     

    Genlock and possibly Wordclock also are something that need to be considered. 
     

    Soneone did actually propose exactly what you are proposing now and we had a discussion about that here. I believe he did start development, but I‘m not sure where it’s at

  18. 4 hours ago, Chris Woodcock said:

    Kish lives in the UK and while he is still the mastermind behind their radios, they will focus on the UK headquarters 


    Yes, they made that clear. But Sound Devices is more than what was Audio Ltd. and they have many more customers outside the UK than in. Plus they already had an up and running service facility in Berlin. 
    Anyway, I‘m not privvy to the decision making process, but this appaears wrong on almost every level

×
×
  • Create New...