tonetripper

do you have the schematic or the order for these. This cart is exactly what I'm trying to come up with for my kit. My rubbermaid is working fine but its too bulky and big. Really great build by the way! Paul

I have some camera teams that feel the need to not leave sync boxes on cameras. Should this be the case? I obviously try to indulge them in the sync box but just wondering how well they hold code? Meaning the Venice

You've got to use them at low squelch. It's not diversity so on high squelch the RF will be very ropey. Also I recommend using a dipole antenna with the G3 Tx. Lo squelch will help if set on receivers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I like the Bose noise cancelling ones the best because during noisy environments where I may wear a construction hat I can tell better what comes to me, and they are super comfortable and great for plane rides. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'll raise it to the directors attention but that's where the fight usually ends. Most of them should know better IMHO. Saying that, the scissors are much finer and with many more tools at the editors disposal to seam together their edit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well I've had this happen to me two days in a row now and my suspicions are lying with extreme sandisk. Now on Delkin approved media so I guess we'll see

Thanks

Hey James for some reason, and it may be that I purchased the app before you added the power control, I don't have that functionality on my app. I don't want to buy it again. Is there a workaround? Ive already deleted the app and then reinstalled from the cloud but still does not appear on my iPhone 5. I use the app all the time and that power functionality would come in handy at points. Paul

The 633 all the way. No moving parts. Good limiters. Decent preamps. IVe owned a 744. Own a 788, 302, 633. I use my 633 even for drama. You'd be hard pressed to notice a difference in fidelity between it and the 700 series from SD. Also track selection is a pain. You have to go in the menu to alter certain things ( been a while since I used it - sold it a while back ). 633 is one of the best sound purchases I've made

"Bending over in anticipation" - Ao Loo

I stand firmly planted between both. I've used the 788 CL9 setup for a few years now and am just now upgrading to the SXST. The reason for this is simple. Dynamics. I want to have less physical control of the dynamics through the use of the input limiters. The limitations of the control surface is the need to adjust the mic pres in order to deal with the peaks and valleys of levels. The limiters can only contain so much on the 788 without, to my ears, hearing the breakup and my need for creating continuous background level in my ISOs without hearing those adjustments for those loud/soft moments. I have had great success with the control surface because I'm comfortable with being inside the machine, but at the end of the day I need the EQ, I need the limiters and need the tactile aspects of the "big iron" as it were. Also I think it's purely selfish as I want to hear my mics as they are meant to be heard. Saying all this I'm not afraid of the control surface. I've made it work to good effect thus far. They both have their advantages. Deep down, however, the sonosax is priced so high for a reason.

Like a good wine - depends on the year for th ol 416

Three words: Complimentary frame sizes Works for lighting and sound for the most part. Saying that, outside noisy exteriors - dealers choice.

Thanks Chris! House of Cards is also a fantastic sounding show. I'm sure Bruce's ways may have rubbed off on him to some degree. i may do get in contact with both of them as I'm impressed with both shows and am always challenging my own ways of negotiating audio in my own universe. I love this forum for the communication. Paul

That's an amazing read Jan! Thanks! Fascinating all the folding of simulated location sounds built in after the fact. Some very real moments there. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk