Jump to content

When Actors' Heads Bend Down...


Jan McL

Recommended Posts

Even when the wires sound well, when the actor looks down and they get much closer to the lav mic, I have yet to find a mixing technique that sounds transparent. I typically bring the level of the lav down but have been reluctant to bring up the level of 'air' from the boom to accomplish what my ears want to hear. I think this would do it, but...something stops me from pushing it far enough.

Maybe just typing this will help get me there.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In post I do make an EQ and level change for this, same if their hands come up in front of the mic or they end up facing a wall etc really close. It's tough to do this on the fly w/o rehearsals and everyone hitting their marks, but I've done it (mostly on commercials where the same shot is done thru dozens of takes).

phil p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hear ya, BAB414, but if the boom could get it, I wouldn't be using the wires and boom as 'air'.

Speaking of the issue here has given me the guts to more aggressively cross-fade lav/boom during head moves.

Thank goodness for excellent posties and iso tracks!

@Phil, actor-by-the-window sound always bugs me too. Have successfully convinced a number of boom ops to go for the reflection off the glass rather than try to get ahead of 'em...much better that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hear ya, BAB414, but if the boom could get it, I wouldn't be using the wires and boom as 'air'.

Speaking of the issue here has given me the guts to more aggressively cross-fade lav/boom during head moves.

Thank goodness for excellent posties and iso tracks!

@Phil, actor-by-the-window sound always bugs me too. Have successfully convinced a number of boom ops to go for the reflection off the glass rather than try to get ahead of 'em...much better that way.

That works for me too.

When they bend their heads I try to persuade my boom ops to move the mic away from the actor and point straight down, especially if its over a table - same principle as the glass. Enables me to pull down the lav and not get that heavy sound.

As for getting the mix right each time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been fortunate to have excellent posties of late, but...on some shows...not so much. Bugs the hell outta me to hear the proximity increase and background ambience fade away to nuthin'. Prefer to give you post heroes time to finesse by finessing m'self more. Glad to know it's an easy EQ fix tho :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've worked with boom ops who are genius at digging those kinds of words out, even without benefit of a reflective surface. Wish there was an active boom op section here for them to share THEIR secrets... That said, Boom Ops seem more able to better disengage from their craft during off hours (not to paint with too broad a brush, but...) than we are with our big investments in gear, esoteric knowledge and whatnot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actor head down. The boom op should follow the mouth (head) move as possible.

If the setup of boom/mic is 30o or 60o degrees to be "on-spot" actor mouth in previous movement, after that you have problem when the actor head closing down. I recommend to use 90o degree setup boom/mic and what I said in first line. If that not works try cardoid capsule for boom. And if this not work again try this: Boom for lower frequencies with low gain in collaboration with lavalier.

Maybe tomorrow to show you with pictures what a mean for 30o, 60o, 90o degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With boom operating, whatever works, works - and whatever doesn't sound good is the wrong solution.

I've read some responses here that run counter to my experience - notably going overhead and pointing straight down (getting the audio on the bounce from the floor?) but I wouldn't argue with success.

My approach has always been to withdraw the boom, go low and "shotgun" in. That is, try to get in under the actor to dig out the audio. Not quite the same thing as booming from below (although that's also an option if one can make the changeover), more a matter of just getting a good line of sight to the speaker's mouth.

How much one should be concerned about acoustic irregularities depends on context. A film shouldn't sound like it was all perfectly recorded in a studio; a little bit of perspective shift as someone moves in a space actually gives the recording a subtle authenticity and shouldn't, I think, be completely stripped from the track. One has to ask, is the actor delivering the entire Gettysburg Address while contemplating his navel? If that's so, clearly some remedy needs to be applied. But if he's merely dropping his head for a line, like Spencer Tracy checking his mark, then the momentary audio shift is, I think, entirely acceptable.

Anyway, pull back, drop lower (usually possible if you are pulling back) and shotgun in. It's always worked for me. (Maybe I just have lower standards.)

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, pull back, drop lower (usually possible if you are pulling back) and shotgun in.

I think I may be with you, david. When I'm booming, I think I tend to side mic these situations a bit... find a line-of-sight. But to the original Q, that doesn't help much if your'e in a situation where you HAVE to rely on a wire. That's where I would leave it up to post to smooth out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With boom operating, whatever works, works - and whatever doesn't sound good is the wrong solution.

<<<<<<<>>>>>>>

Anyway, pull back, drop lower (usually possible if you are pulling back) and shotgun in. It's always worked for me. (Maybe I just have lower standards.)

David

Yup, love the little perspective shift when people move. (not off-mic of course, but the ever-changing sound of the dialogue bouncing off set-pieces/walls/etc)

thankfully, so do most of the mixers I work with :)

as for digging out lines with head drops - I've always instinctively done what David's suggesting, to my ear it just sounds right.

now as for a person close talking into a Wall or window...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...