Joe Riggs Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 A quasi continuation from my other recent posts. The hits just keep coming; let's talk levels for a moment. I've gone through the audio for the first couple days and the levels are pretty low around -42 to -30db and occasionally peaking around -24db. This is occurring for both the boom and lavs. From my understanding the levels should be around -12db? I'm not just talking about Wide shots where the boom can't be near the actors either, the same thing is happening in Mediums and O/S, and it's not framed in some artistic way, the players heads are near the top of the frame, so the boom mic if placed properly should be giving a pretty strong signal and I imagine the lavs should be as well. The boom mic, sounds okay when boosting the signal, but clearly with the boost, noise is being added. The lav on the other hand sounds pretty bad with a boosted signal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Blankenship Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Finally there's a post deserving of Senator Mike's responses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Toline Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 It seems you're not gain staging or setting up your levels from mixer to recorder and or camera properly. More information is needed to explain your ultra low levels & noise. Eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamTimmer Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Standard peaks are in the -12 to -5 range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afewmoreyears Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 One way to fix this problem is to have the DP place a tire somewhere in the background of each shot, or at least the master... then when you boost all the gains to have a workable soundtrack, the accompanying hiss created should make some sense... there is simply air coming out of the tire... On a more serious note, and not to be impolite, but the poor person is woefully unqualified for the job position... he or she missed the target on almost all points of concern.. at least something showed up on the tracks... +1 for them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ju Griz Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Finally there's a post deserving of Senator Mike's responses. +9001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Visser Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 (ALL REF TO dBFS) I would tend to shoot for consistent -14 to -10dB peaks. We're talking about normal dialogue here - if the talent is whispering or soft spoken, there is no need to try to force it to modulate at -10. If a few occasional peaks slip through right up to the limiter - no problem. I would suspect the experience of someone who tries to really go for it and make their levels hot right up to the limiter as a standard - too risky. If someone delivers consistent -20db (even down to -24dB) levels, there's nothing "wrong" with that as the levels should be able to be brought up to appropriate levels with minimal noise if recorded in 24 bit, with everything gain staged correctly, and with professional level gear. If it is a known fact that the show is mostly going to be cut with ISOs, the mix is just scratch, it is an unscripted show, comedy act with dynamic deliveries, etc... some good reasons to provide a very conservative -20dB or lower recording. If you can't bring up -24dB without unacceptable noise levels, then the recordist was either recording in an unacceptably noisy location, didn't know how to gain stage his gear, or was otherwise using unprofessional equipment. I mean, from what I've heard regarding this and other posts of yours, it sounds like the location recordist blew it - production's fault really, for not vetting their production mixer or not allocating enough funds to bring on a professional - now it's time to pay the piper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiomprd Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Joe Riggs is going to clean up ($$$) on this show... if it is really a show... " occasionally peaking around -24db. " perhaps since this was recorded at 32FP/44.1 these are like neverclip trax ?? I agree that more clear, complete information would be helpful, but it also appears that it is what it is, and growling about it will not change that, so Joe, just deal with it, and bill the client appropriately. (don't worry, they saved a bunch on production sound) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VASI Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Don't ask what is "NeverClip". For the good of community. Haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Constantin Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 But when you do bring up the gain, do the voices sound distant or close? If they are close, i.e. the boom mic at least might have been in the right position, the audio might be salvageable. If not, I think it'll be tricky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Feeley Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 One way to fix this problem is to have the DP place a tire somewhere in the background of each shot, or at least the master... then when you boost all the gains to have a workable soundtrack, the accompanying hiss created should make some sense... there is simply air coming out of the tire... Brilliant! Agreed about the apparent lack of qualifications of the person in the field. Sigh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afewmoreyears Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 Brilliant! Agreed about the apparent lack of qualifications of the person in the field. Sigh. Hopefully folks know I'm kidding.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWilson Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 I've got a space saving tyre in my car for that exact reason : D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Perkins Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 The meters in FCP/Avid etc are only for general reference anyhow--they are not showing you true peak, and they have unknown ballistics. Production mixers tend to be conservative about peaks. Iso tracks tend to be significantly lower level than mix tracks, that is as it should be. philp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Riggs Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 Philip, -42 to -30db low? That's pretty low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 That is low, unless the mixer was anticipating the talent to go from quiet to screaming, in which case the level could jump as much as 50db. It sounds like you have tasked with cleaning up the mistakes of an ill equipped, and probably inexperienced psm. Btw, -12 would be really hot for any scene with dynamic preformance. maybe expected in an interview, but i would expect lower if the situation isn't totally controlled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afewmoreyears Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 That is low, unless the mixer was anticipating the talent to go from quiet to screaming, in which case the level could jump as much as 50db. It sounds like you have tasked with cleaning up the mistakes of an ill equipped, and probably inexperienced psm. Btw, -12 would be really hot for any scene with dynamic preformance. maybe expected in an interview, but i would expect lower if the situation isn't totally controlled. I record peaks to -12 all the time... you get a feel scene to scene... it's never been a problem.... If it's more an Improv thing, I back off my ISO a bit more, but with a limiter engaged on my mix track.. I have never had an issue... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiomprd Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) " -42 to -30db low? That's pretty low. " not for 32 bit neverclip... " you have tasked with cleaning up the mistakes of an ill equipped, and probably inexperienced psm. " and probably an inexperienced, and ill-equipped movie maker... it is what it is... your work is cut out for you... start the clock, and...cha-ching. Edited October 30, 2013 by studiomprd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Constantin Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 Philip, -42 to -30db low? That's pretty low. So, Joe, what does it sound like when you do bring up the gain? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 not for 32 bit neverclip.... Wtf is that? You seem to have taken to mis-using the term neverclip where it is completely irrelevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 I record peaks to -12 all the time... you get a feel scene to scene... it's never been a problem.... If it's more an Improv thing, I back off my ISO a bit more, but with a limiter engaged on my mix track.. I have never had an issue... The point i wanted to make was about large dynamic range content, more so than about ideal levels. Knowing nothing about the content recorded, it's hard to say where the peak levels should sit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiomprd Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 " mis-using the term neverclip " you mean NeverClip ?? that is Zaxcom's system. I'm generic, and a 32bit sample has even more dynamic range potential than Zaxcom's NeverClip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VASI Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 You must be careful doing 32bit processing and after exporting to 24bit life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RPSharman Posted October 30, 2013 Report Share Posted October 30, 2013 I record peaks to -12 all the time... you get a feel scene to scene... it's never been a problem.... If it's more an Improv thing, I back off my ISO a bit more, but with a limiter engaged on my mix track.. I have never had an issue... +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Smith Posted October 31, 2013 Report Share Posted October 31, 2013 Phil: This is a good point, one that many editors seem to be blissfully ignorant of. Although useful for steady-state signals, they are nowhere near the ballistics of any professional meter I've ever encountered. --S The meters in FCP/Avid etc are only for general reference anyhow--they are not showing you true peak, and they have unknown ballistics. Production mixers tend to be conservative about peaks. Iso tracks tend to be significantly lower level than mix tracks, that is as it should be. philp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.