Jump to content

Pix 970 - Delivered


Richard Lightstone, CAS

Recommended Posts

WE: " Seems this recorder is geared towards more than just dialog recording. "

not if you want a separate track, not just for every mic, but for every line in a scene...

sadly, the system seems to be clamoring for more, and more, tracks.

in another recent thread, some folks were poo-phooing the new NAGRA 7 for being only two tracks ...

and now folks are wanting overdubbing, too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needs overdubbing to record music----guess what, music is more fun than recording yammering.

 

                             J.D.

That's true for me and JD who has also spent decades recording actors, someone who has recorded music for decades might like actors better. Hard to say. As for the OP, can't wait for the real world reports from RL and I'm sure those who follow him into the high  track count recorders.

CrewC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's quite a spread of work in between Scripted Drama production sound and the world of contemporary produced music, where you need more than 8 tracks, but you don't need 'overdubbing'. Reality TV is often un-mixable live and is a big and growing market which, I assume is the core target SD were trying to service here. My much smaller world of live Theatre and Concert recording is the same - we need the most reliable way available to capture multi-track audio with solid timecode and sync facilities, in the smallest space. All our work ends up on ProTools or another DAW in the end, but they are not the best idea for location capture. If you are wanting Overdubbing, you are probably not in a 'one chance to capture a real-time event' type situation. There's a raft of products (like DAWs)  out there to suit you better than this or it's competitor, the JoeCo BBR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I'm in a 'Run-N'-Gun" situation, I'll stick to my Petrol bag with a Deva 5 and a Field Venue. Not much OTS anymore, either Versaflex or it will be on my mini-cart.

 

I'm really surprised at the confusion, yes by some, about the new breed of 'high-track' recorders.  My primary decision to go with the Pix 970 is because I wanted to make the switch to Dante, go totally digital and eliminate a huge amount of interconnecting cabling.

 

I also wanted to get away from my dissatisfaction with Zaxcom, who have dug their heels in and refused to come up with a Dante or even Madi machine, after more than two years of the Sound Devices Pix brand.

 

Over dubbing as stated by others is not a requirement in our business. Pro Tools is perfect for that.

 

By going Dante I eliminate the kluge of 8 AES and 8 Analog sends to a Deva 16, for example.

It is not that I am on shows that require 16 tracks at all. But I have the capability to do so with 1 Cat 6 cable from my Yamaha 01V96 with ease.

 

Lately, on shows with a large cast and Music Playback requirements I've been recording at least 10 tracks. On a Deva 5 that means 8 AES and 2 Analog.

 

On my next show, it means that I can now dedicate specific tracks for the lead cast and keep it that way for 4 and a half months. I'm also helping the Post Sound Department by not having to juggle track assignments.

 

The demands on production are getting larger and so are track counts, even on feature films. It's the future, embrace it.

 

Here are my channel assignments for my next project. 

 

post-273-0-07950600-1398921470_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I or any Mixer can record a show with Booms only, we'll do it. In today's production environment two, even three cameras is the rule. Wide, Wider and Super tight makes using a boom in every setup very difficult. So, increasing use of two plus cameras, no rehearsals, hand held, no discipline is the reason; not increasing availability of tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, increasing use of two plus cameras, no rehearsals, hand held, no discipline is the reason; not increasing availability of tracks.

 

The lack of discipline on the part of the producers is very discouraging. I'm still bewildered at the lack of rehearsal time that goes on, at least on my jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the simplicity of the connection of so many channels between mixer and recorder very much with this thing--I was really impressed with just how many cables Richard eliminated from his cart while increasing his track count.  Each of those cables is a point of potential failure, and adds weight and confusion--good riddance to them.   I'm starting to look for a very small Dante mixer with sliders to be the front end for a Pixie for a super small music recording rig.    What might really rock would be an SD 664 Mk2 that with the CL6 could record 12+2+2 from Dante as an option….

 

philp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the simplicity of the connection of so many channels between mixer and recorder very much with this thing--I was really impressed with just how many cables Richard eliminated from his cart while increasing his track count.  Each of those cables is a point of potential failure, and adds weight and confusion--good riddance to them. ...

 

On the other side of things;

 

On the Dante, just one point of failure takes out all the tracks.

 

Just playing devil's advocate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...