Wandering Ear Posted March 21, 2016 Report Share Posted March 21, 2016 Has anyone used lockstep by figure 53 to slave the pt transport to Ltc? How reliable was it? Would it ever glitch and cause transport errors? I'm considering it as one possible solution, and I thought I'd get some user feedback before I buy it and try it out . Thanks for your thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickreich Posted March 23, 2016 Report Share Posted March 23, 2016 Hi Wandering Ear, yes - I use Lockstep, as well as SMPTE Reader and its current replacement Horae, from sononum.net. I also am a major user of Figure 53's other software - Qlab (which contains the code from Lockstep as it's timecode engine). I find Lockstep can drop connection to the sound card you are feeding TC to if left running for more than about 4 hours, experienced this on several systems. The TC module in QLab does not suffer this in my experience, and I've had some clients computers running Lockstep and ProTools that have never exhibited this problem, so it's probably dependent on what else is going on in your computer. I switched to Sononum's SMPTE Reader (now free, as "legacy" software - supposedly good up to Mountain Lion) and it works day in day out like a charm. If you need Yosemite or higher compatibility, the current (paid) version is the much expanded "Horae", which does MTC-LTC both ways. Unlike Figure 53, who are large by developer standards, Sononum is one guy in Germany, who has recently decided not to continue supporting other products of his, so be aware of that if buying for long-term use in a corporate environment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted March 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2016 Thanks for the feedback Nick. I haven't seen the other software you mentioned, I will check it out if I decide to go this route for my project. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason A Posted April 13, 2016 Report Share Posted April 13, 2016 I run into QLab in quite a few live performance venues. Pretty impressed with how smooth it operates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundmanjohn Posted April 15, 2016 Report Share Posted April 15, 2016 QLab's pretty much the de facto sound, video and (in some cases) show-control software for theatre these days. It pretty much stomped all over the competition when it arrived some years ago and has been regularly updated, with much input from its users. It does rely quite heavily on the audio and video capabilities built into the Mac's OS which can occasionally lead to bugs when Apple changes something that been standard for ages. I've been using it for many years, since a beta version came my way, and if you watched the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympics, much of the sound element, put together by a colleague, was controlled by QLab. A typical theatre installation will run a pair of Mac Minis for redundancy with a changeover switch, although it's rarely needed. Video-heavy shows will use Mac Pro machines for their extra processing headroom. Early on, I had a job persuading one of the major rental companies here in the UK to build a system for me (the first QLab system in London's West End for a show starring Orlando Bloom) but they did it as a special favour. Most playback systems were Windows-based back then, whereas most designers were using Macs for content creation. These days it's rare to find a theatre show that doesn't run QLab. Part of the success of the system is that it's scaleable from the basic, free version, to the all singing and dancing professional version, plus the fact that you can rent a licence for a few bucks a day, if you don't want to lay out the cash for a full licence. Chris Ashworth, who runs Figure 53, is a very nice chap, as are the folks who work with him. Regards, John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Perkins Posted April 16, 2016 Report Share Posted April 16, 2016 QLab isn't the most intuitive app around but it's very deep. They also have the market figured out--the free version is all a lot of people need mostly, esp for building shows, then they can rent the full app for their show if they don't want to (or can't ) buy it. This shows me that these people understand their market very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted April 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2016 I think that license plan is a really smart way to approach their market. I ended up going a different direction for this project, but I haven't ruled out using lockstep going forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.