Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bash   

Hi Patrick,

 

and your points are interesting, but....most all Red cameras have been 'quirky' to the point of unuseable for most sound recording applications. Think 5+ minute takes, on quiet sets, with actors whispering, and camera close to the actors. This is the real test.

 

The Helium (as tested in London by a colleague of mine in the last few days) is significantly louder, AND the menu modes ('quiet', vs 'adaptive preview quiet mode' or whatever it is called) are reversed, so the one that ought to be most quiet is not so. This is ridiculous.

 

Red cameras have loud fans, period.

 

I am aware of your  fanplate for earlier Reds - i have to say that I heard that in some situations your fanplate was louder than the regular camera. I have absolutely no axe to grind with you personally, but that is what I read and understood.

 

More important - why are we making custom built stuff to cover for inadequacies of Red cameras.... because they are unacceptably loud as sold.

 

Red camera have loud fans. End of. It may well be that they have worked so hard to make the camera small and modular that they have made a loud camera.

 

May I ask - who uses a Red camera as 'small' - they are always covered in extra bits. All the bits that were not included by making them so small.

 

I am really sorry, but so far as I am concerned Red cameras, which might or might not make pretty pictures, should be used for car adverts and beauty shots.

 

Someone had to say this.

 

Simon B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Useless...

 

 

4 hours ago, drpro said:

I love to see these expensive cameras with a $300 Rokinon lens!!

 

First shot is with a Superspeed MKIII

Second is with a Standard speed

Third is with a Rokinon 35mm wich is optically very interesting for lowbudget.

 

Do I also have to argue about the optics I use?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fellow Sound Professionals:  The constructive solutions offered here are what we are really about.  RED bashing, though way too often true, is not what we are really about.

  We in the old school remember quite well how much noise Film Cameras made.  Lots of innovation over the decades was required to help with that.

    Was there ever a “Perfect” Film Camera??

Blimp Arri.tiff

Let me riddle you this:  Since the advent of ‘Digital Cine’, cameras have done a poor job of recording sound – some cameras are getting better – BUT with those poor audio capabilities came the need for Double System sound with time code.   A delightful step backward in film making.   And suddenly, an FP-32 just wasn’t enough.   FP 32.jpg

The bashing of bad sound in motion picture devices, in my opinion, is a little counter productive.  Productions NEED Good Sound Pros.  The Best Sound Pros are about innovating and solving issues.  Sure, it would be nice if every camera was ‘Perfect’.  That would make every job easy.  Right?  An then, if every job was easy, well then, anybody could do it…..       M*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nevo   

I work mainly in tv commercials and drama...... 90 percent of my jobs shoot on Alexa......Very rarely do we have any issues.There used to more Red shoots but , it's a rareity to see one these days.
Mostly it's owner operator shoots...... Just my day to day experiance


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My approach to Reds is if it works I am happy, If it doesn't work I don't worry about it. No one ever bought a Red because they liked the way it reliably

dealt with sound.

 

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a strange Red Weapon  incident today. Providing hops to two Weapons, both cameras at least three times crashed while recording  the first take, with a message that said "audio buffering". One of the DPs owned one of the cameras and was perplexed. Of course the ACs immediately wanted to rip off the receivers.. come to find out, both DPs had never completed a full reformat? I did not know there is a partial re format?  Once they did that the problem went away. I have worked with the RED Weapon several times and this was the first time I have experienced this issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/23/2017 at 11:45 AM, Patrick Tresch said:

Arri had to create the mini AND the Alexa 65 to be on par with what RED achieved in a smaller package. RED pushed the use of R3D compressed RAW wich makes lowbudget at highest quality possible for a lot of folks. And R3D raw is trillion better to color correction than what Alexa used during years as their master codec : Prores... !

 

Well... speaking as a guy who color-corrects more than he does sound (I just completed my 12th feature this year for home video, plus two theatrical releases), the reality is that nobody in town finishes features or TV series in Raw. All Red or Arriraw files are converted first to DPX or EXR, and those are what the final color-corrections are done in. This was true even for massive releases like Guardians of the Galaxy 2, shot in 8K Red Raw. I wouldn't say that Red is a "trillion times" better than ProRes, and I would say that I generally see fewer visual problems with Alexa footage than I do with Red. I think given a great DP, they can get great results with both. I don't see the camera as the limiting factor these days. 

 

Most of the audio people here have a point that the Red cameras in general have been very audio unfriendly. I think it's low on their list of priorities, even with the new Helium camera. Competing cameras from Arri and Sony and Panasonic just work right out of the box with balanced audio in. Just saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IronFilm   
On 8/24/2017 at 6:45 AM, Patrick Tresch said:

RED pushed the use of R3D compressed RAW wich makes lowbudget at highest quality possible for a lot of folks. And R3D raw is trillion better to color correction than what Alexa used during years as their master codec : Prores... ! 

 


Arri has Arriraw as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never colored shots made by a RED,  wich don't contain any FX, in another format than with it's original R3D, even in 2008 (then I used Scratch)

Arriraw is not what most people shoot with and was an expensive and heavy addon for years (remember Codex?).

 

 

PS: I finish all my films for the big screen in 4k since 2012.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rodpaul   

I must have gone to the wrong tab - I could have sworn this was an audio forum.

 

As a DP and camera owner (no Reds now or ever), I concur that digital cinema cameras are not simply designed for recording audio - which is often integrated almost as an afterthought. In fact early digital cameras weren't great on time code either. I'm impressed with the knowledge most audio guys bring to shoots as I guess understanding the various models is a fact of life now. Note that Mr. Jannard came with a background in sunglasses, not film, which is probably why his designs excelled at sensor design but were (and maybe are) among the least user friendly and reliable cameras around. For contrast look at the stories around this week about Arri, a brand now 100 years old. Not to pile on Reds anymore, but my old Auricon conversion recorded better sound. And if you got the mic far enough away, you could even avoid hearing the camera occasionally... and it never needed rebooting.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×