AlbertoGarciaAltez

I have Canare L-3D2W with Canare BNC(50 ohms) conector for that cable BP-C31. I use 3M for cart and 12M extensions no active antenas, only passive, Zaxcom. For more than 12M you need use active system. http://www.canare.com/ProductItemDisplay.aspx?productItemID=190 http://www.canare.com/ProductItemDisplay.aspx?productItemID=169

In my opinion, I don't like DPA ( expecially 4070.....) i find more interesting for your use , Mke 1, its sounds very good , very easy to hide. Mke 2 and Mke 1 are the best to avoid the background noise. DPA 4060 it's overvalued, for me the best lavalier is Cos 11D. The mk1 it's very usefull in a heavy traffic situation , on a very crowd location, or when the clothes are very light you can hide easily. The system 112 or 500? 500 with 50Mw Rf power could help in some situations, but are very the same. www.albertogarciaaltez.com

Thanks!!

How do you turn 3 poly files with 8 tracks each and it's metadata, into 1 poly file

Thanks

A small +- as cantarem, 14/16 faders( less for a 16 track recorder i don't understand) just faders the rotary gain pots, trasnport, solo, metadata etc are on the SX-R4+ , or through the app, i don't need them duplicated. And a second with 16 faders, pots, transport, metadata etc. As cantares or zaxcom mix16. But the importan thing is, now please , please. As we say in Spain: La necesitamos para ayer (we need it for yesterday.

Beyerdinamic 1350 vs Sennheiser hd25

Bondic. www.notaglue.com

I owned one , 4 chanels. I think my old busines partner sitll has it. Good press, very good límiter.

Audio Ltd? 100% digital, mini sd you can record while transmiting if you are un Europ. Have 12v,48v and analog límiter, wide range, a remote phone app. https://audioltd.com

The mix limiter on th SX-R4+ I didn't use the Cantar x3. But when i tried at the spanish dealer, i found mic pres exactly the same as Cantar x2. The big diference , for me: Dynamic range, much more SX-R4+ than X3. SX-R4+ little bit brigthnees, Cantar its a little dark,for me. Both are very good, the best ones. Thanks

I have one with the same noise, but just when i unpacked. I sent it to the spanish sat (garantee) they change the capsule, but still with a click noise when i move the microphon. Sennheiser sent me a new one. Goodluck!

Hello, thanks! I had a Cantar x2 , but when i was upgrade to x3, i didn't like it. I think it's overprice, here in Spain a normal produccion pays for gear about 900€ weekly, the whole gear(mics, radiomics, ifb, tc lockits.........) . The Digital imputs in the R4+/AD8, the micpre, limiter, the size, weight, convince me more. I started with the SX-S: Mix to line inputs5 / 6 and the direct outputs to the line level R4+, the extra radios to the line level recorder inputs. Now all the micros directly to the recorder inputs, mic input for boom, line level for radios. Radios are analog ,when i have digital ones then will going trhough Aes inputs. Micpres are more noisless, than the SX-S, but same warm, and sound.The limiter is smother, and more natural than the SX-S. Thanks!! Sorry for my English...

As a SX-R4+ & AD-8 user: just love it. Radio Stefanov, don't really know how it works, or you don't have one in your hands, other wise don't say things like that. SD slot: Easy acces to sd, and always see led indicator, ,blink when standby or fixe when record. I find it usefull. Things i miss in the SX-R4+: Fader control surface 16 fader. Keyboard for notes. Talkback section. 16 track horizontal view. File tag with scene, shot, take, insted a file number.

I really miss a control surface. Please develop as soon as possible. I think with 14 faders 120mm long, transport, solo,EQ(filters) would be enought. I miss a keybord to write notes etc. There is another issue, the file tag should be the scen, shot, and take, because editors when open the file see: sx 001, instead of scen....