Hi folks. New to the board here.
Looking forward to alle I can learn here.
I live in Oslo in Norway. I use exclusively Zaxcom for lavs, and the Nomad or a 633 for recorder.
We have a couple of Lectronics antennas for a Zaxcom QRX200, and after comparing them to the standard antennas we get 1 pixel(!) better reception. I have to say I´m seriously underwhelmed. Are we doing something wrong, or is that as expected?
The standard antennas give pretty good coverage, by all means, but sometimes you just wish for a few meters more when an actor is moving a away on a wide shot.
(I know we can set the trxs to record, but this thread is about wireless range...)
Anybody have a tip on what is wrong?
...edited electronics to Lectronics (Safari autocorrected it)...