it seems that the modified Oktava - not the Mic with the stock electronic - can be in a similar class like the Audix and the Audio Technica. Is it so or is it some steps undermatched like the Mic with the stock electronic ?
I know the Oktava Problem wit the Handling-Noise, that can be cure with a good shokmount and windshield.
I'am looking for a Microphone in ordwer to use on a boompole for inddor dialogue addiotional to my Sennheiser MKH 416.
My Question: Is a Oktava MK 012 with modified electronic a real option, or its better, to buy a Audix or Audio Technica ?
How is the Quality of the Oktava MK 012 Hypercardoid capsule against the Audix and Audio Technica?
I know the Standards MKH 50 and Shoeps Hypercardoid Combo, but its for me to expensive.
.png.279748a58a2b862b7aa5f3b84126e232.png)
Oktava MK012 with modified electronic vs. Audix SCX1-HC vs. Autdio Technica AT 4053b for booming indoor dialogue
in Equipment
Posted
Hi Guys,
when I look at he webpage http://www.rauschenbergstudio.com/Shop/shop_content.php?coID=11
and compare the sound-examples from the MK 012 UPdated Electronics with the KM 184 ant the Gefell M300
it seems that the modified Oktava - not the Mic with the stock electronic - can be in a similar class like the Audix and the Audio Technica. Is it so or is it some steps undermatched like the Mic with the stock electronic ?
I know the Oktava Problem wit the Handling-Noise, that can be cure with a good shokmount and windshield.
I'am looking for a Microphone in ordwer to use on a boompole for inddor dialogue addiotional to my Sennheiser MKH 416.
My Question: Is a Oktava MK 012 with modified electronic a real option, or its better, to buy a Audix or Audio Technica ?
How is the Quality of the Oktava MK 012 Hypercardoid capsule against the Audix and Audio Technica?
I know the Standards MKH 50 and Shoeps Hypercardoid Combo, but its for me to expensive.
Thanks a Lot!
HoJ