jrobertandrus
-
Posts
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by jrobertandrus
-
-
Joppe,
Let me know next time you're putting some of these together, I could use a good bulk charger and this looks pretty amazing.
-
Ok, so I adjust the gain from the nomad, but monitor it on the QRX, I'll check it out. Thanks
-
I just received my ZMT3-Phantom 2 transmitter with a QRX200 receiver to go along with my Nomad10, it's an exciting time! However I have a couple of questions about the general workflow.
I've used the tone generator from the transmitter to set the trim coming into the mixer (currently analog, I'm having a digital cable made, but it's not yet ready) . I have the faders setup as normal (controlling mix), and I can, of course, adjust the transmitter gain from my Nomad, however I can't tell what the gain is set to from my mixer (which makes sense, as it isn't sending zaxnet info back to the nomad), but it makes it a bit more difficult to set levels. With a hard wired mic I can use the autotrim functionality and see the levels as I adjust it, with the remote gain, I can't see the levels as I adjust, and since it doesn't tell me where it's at, it can be hard to tell if I adjusted it by 5db or 10db. So I end up making some adjustments, then backing out of the Zaxnet screen, checking levels, and then going back into the zaxnet screen to adjust it a bit more, until I get it right where I want it. I realize that if I set a fader to the remote gain, then I would have a better idea where the gain is set (based on fader position) and would be able to see the levels as I adjust, but I'd rather leave my faders for adjusting the mix. I would just use the mixer trim, but that kind of defeats the purpose of using tone to calibrate gain stage levels.
So I guess my question, is how has everybody else been handling this? Am I missing something, or is there a better workflow for these mics?
-
Thanks Jack. I'll stick with QRX200 then.
-
I'm getting ready to buy my first Zaxcom wireless units, and can't seem to quite get my head around all of the options. I use a Nomad 10 for my mixer, so I have Zaxnet control from there. Is there any advantage to getting a QRX235 with the QIFB if I'm already using a Nomad or should I be looking more at the QRX200? Does having the QIFB option allow for auto scanning and assigning channels like the RX-12 will when connected to a Nomad, or is it just for manual remote control?
Np50 Bulk Charger V3.0 Travel edition (on request 16 Bay UPDATE)
in Manufacturers & Dealers
Posted
Yes I'd like to be added to that list.