-
Posts
6,622 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
About RadoStefanov
- Birthday 04/13/1978
Profile Information
-
Location
Las Vegas US
-
About
Las Vegas Sound Mixer/supervisor for TV/Broadcasting
-
Interested in Sound for Picture
Yes
Recent Profile Visitors
33,431 profile views
-
AMAZING!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU! Did your broke?
-
SELF NOISE DOES NOT MATTER ANYMORE…
-
Microdot Splitter? Transmit & Record on a budget?
RadoStefanov replied to Luke Zimmer's topic in Equipment
For the record the patent has 2 more years -
Microdot Splitter? Transmit & Record on a budget?
RadoStefanov replied to Luke Zimmer's topic in Equipment
Zaxcom wireless used is the cheapest 2nd hand wireless -
Private equity owners of gear we use
RadoStefanov replied to RadoStefanov's topic in General Discussion
We agree here. If you researched you would know the chronology. Seam? Unless you show me evidence “which i doubt exists” this is a ether misleading or uneducated statement. Seam? Unless you show me evidence “which i doubt exists” this is a ether misleading or uneducated statement. Seam? Unless you show me evidence “which i doubt exists” this is a ether misleading or uneducated statement. I have zero feelings about the USA patent laws or proceeders. My thing is I have been listening to nonsense for pretty much 18 years. At the end of the day if lectrosonics wanted to provide this to their users they could. Deity was licensed to do it and had the zaxcom name on the back on the transmitter. Later on the deal broke. There are a lot of things that Lectrosonics can do that does not involve patents. But they are 20th century Dinosaur. Zaxcom , Shure and even sound devices are doing a great job releasing modern products. “Yes Wysicom have a good product that works surpassingly well for analog wireless but it is still an analog wireless. -
Private equity owners of gear we use
RadoStefanov replied to RadoStefanov's topic in General Discussion
It is a lot easier if you familiarize yourself with things that you are talking about. Also lectro did not care for it because they had a big chunk of the market and refused to innovate. This was a giant mistake and their market share shrunk by a lot. I really dont see a reason to use lectrosonics in 2025. -
Private equity owners of gear we use
RadoStefanov replied to RadoStefanov's topic in General Discussion
Technically unable. also ... Pride And they tried the stick instead of the carrot. -
Private equity owners of gear we use
RadoStefanov replied to RadoStefanov's topic in General Discussion
Everybody could have the recording license for pretty much free and Deity did. This is not the point. The point is the mom and pop of family owned company is not listening to some Private Equity assholes and making a guitar wireless. By the way SHURE is a family owned company and it is hard to see how somebody can move their market position. True, I invented bunch of zaxcom things. I could have patented them in advance. But I did not. Because I dont have the funds to grading them. Exactly on point. People have tried. If you know the history of zaxcom you can follow all the inventions : They were first in everything. By sometime 12 years. I dont care about patents. When did I go ballistic and for what? Examples? I really don’t give a fuck about the patents. And to be honest blaming the patent for the inaction on internal recording is very dishonest. People could have made gear for the overseas market long time ago, I mean look at remote control of TX: Apart from SHure nobody else can do it right. I dont think this is the patents fault.
