Jason Nightall

This is not necessary. Go to the rycote website and search for MKH70, they point to the standard WS6 kit with 2 single lyre 82 mounts (see pic). Link: https://mymic.rycote.com/products/windshield-solutions/modular-windshield-kit/modular-windshield-ws-6-kit/ I use exactly this for my MKH70 and it works great. I've seen a lot of long and even short shotguns mounted in the double, double invision mounts which is so stiff they offer little shock dampening.

My main bag mixer is a 633 recording at 24bit and my lightweight run and gun bag uses a MixPre-3 II recording at 32bit float. I also have some Wisycom MTP60’s that record to an internal SD card at 32 bit float. I often send a mix of 24 and 32 bit files to post with no issues. Most post production software vendors seem to be up to speed with it now so if anyone came back to me regarding my files I’d first suggest they update to the latest version if possible. Regarding 32bit float in general, seems to be aimed at lower cost recording devices marketed towards one-man-band camera guys who need to record in a 'set it and forget it' style. The Scorpio and other 8 series recorders don’t support it (according to the Sound Devices website). So it's probably cheaper for manufacturers to put 32bit float recording capabilities into a sound recorder than it is to install good limiters. There are some innovative uses for it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP0M1kWMPD8&t=819s

416 has the following going for it IMO: Good price second hand, lots available to chose from. A real workhorse. Can withstand a wide range of temperatures and weather. Will last years, decades if you look after it. Some consider it to be the "cinema sound" microphone. Lots of accessories available for it second hand. Rycote has a wind shield and other parts specifically for the 416 for example. One of the few bits of sound kit clients might have heard of so you could potentially use it to market yourself. Can't say that with most sound kit unless your clients are very technical and in the game. Or just save up for the mic you really want. I don't think the NTG4 is a bad mic although I don't own one so can't really comment.

The Betso bowtie has an inbuilt 700 MHz low pass filter, which is a bonus if your antenna distribution doesn't have any filtering.

For those that use them, how are you guys sourcing your multichannel ambiences, atmospheres and room tones? Do you build them from stereo recordings or do you use original multichannel recordings that match the target format?

I have a not-very-old MKH50 and noticed RF interference in certain locations that I think was originating from security or CCTV systems in the building. I sent it off the Sennheiser to be looked at and the engineer said it needed a new board which would be £250 to fix. Was a bit annoyed that I had to pay to fix their design fault that they appeared to know about but not own up to, but that lead nowhere. Seems any second hand MKH50 could have this issue. I still wouldn’t get rid of mine though, its one of the best mics I own.

Thanks Roland, thats a very interesting document, very detailed.

Would there be any issue with using a small microphone in a larger windshield. For example putting an MKH50 in a Rycote WS4 windshield which is designed for shotguns? Obviously the microphone will be further from the front of the windshield than the sides so would this have any negative effect from an acoustics point of view?

If you have a separate physical Cedar unit it seems it would be easier to charge extra kit cost for that as opposed to a plugin you already have in your recorder you can just turn on whenever you want (although you paid $xxxx for the license but explaining that to a client would be a harder conversation... "but we are already paying you for the sound recorder and that has noise reduction built in now right?") I'd be inclined to get iZotope RX and to try and have them commission me for some post production work, though it depends on the job I guess. My 2cents anyway. It is impressive Sound Devices units have the power for this now though.

Indeed. Good for when you want less reverberation picked up too, despite being omnidirectional. I also like the cable strength on the cos11 - talent are not always gentle with my lav mics.

Its an open hall so its all taking place in a large room. The only thing blocking line of sight will be other actors as they move around. Camera hops not required.

Hi all I’m recording a film next week which is about an improv group. Its partially scripted but a lot of the time they will be performing real improv sessions and all eight actors need wireless lavs so they can move and speak freely. There will be 2 cameras moving at random so I will also need to be mobile to stay out of their gaze so this means 8 wireless receivers in one bag. I have 4 Lectro SMDB’s in the 606 band with SRB receivers. I also have 4 standard Sennheiser G2 transmitters and receivers in the Band E range (around 830-865 mhz) so theres my eight channels. All transmitters and receivers will be using whip antennas. I have also used the FreqFinder app to pick frequencies that avoid intermods. Theres no budget for sharkfins or any of that fancy stuff. Is there anything else I can do to stack the deck in my favour and get good reception on all 8 channels?

Hi. I am making some TA3 cables for my 633 an the Sound devices manual states: “Pin-1 = ground, pin-2 = hot (+), and pin-3 = cold (-)” but doesn’t show exactly which pin is hot and cold on their device. I notice the TA3 plug has different pin assignments compared to standard XLR and just want to check I should follow the pin numbering on the plug I have? So pin 2 on the TA3 is hot even though the pin in that location on a standard XLR plug would be cold? Please see the photo Theres a very good chance I am over thinking this but I don’t want to get this wrong.

Very interesting. Reminds me of this:

Thanks for the replies, some great points to think about.