Matt Bacon AMPS

Sorry I am a Lectro novice here in the UK. Could someone explain why the 200b/c transmitter models are not compatible with the new SR receivers? I know the new generation are digital hybrid but they have various compatibility modes? I assume it is compounder related but have been unable to find a definitive answer. Cheers

I had a similar issue yesterday. Removed the Sandisk CF card and all is now well. Very odd! I have sent my sounddev folder to sound devices to learn more.

From a UI perspective, maybe a wizard step-by-step approach could work. First the user is given the option to input or select a beginning frequency and end frequency followed by frequencies to avoid (which are highlighted by your Lectro scan) then ask how many intermod channels required before generating a list. The software could automatically space them out automatically (by selecting from alternate ends of the the list of available frequencies). Just a thought.

I have been in contact with the guys behind this and are having a sneak peek this month of some early production units. Will report back once I've played with them. From what I've discussed, they seem to have thought of everything

Hi Larry, Any update? Thanks

Hi James I've emailed you direct with my first impressions and thoughts on UI and functionality. Regards Matt

Hi Larry May also add my concerns that next year UK recordists will only legally have 606-614 without buying a site specific license which will mean that we'll often need to fit upto 8 channels between 606-614 at 50mW using my Lectrosonic radiomics on block 606. According to the new FreqFinder app nine intermod channels can be run on Lectrosonic Radiomics (site specific conditions allowing). These are 606.000, 606.400, 607.000, 607.800, 608.300, 609.900, 610.800, 612.500 and 613.600!? Like many UK recordists, when working on a shoot where lots of Radiomics are required I rely on an intermod frequency plan. The reason is that production companies often want you to arrive and start immediately! Setting your radiomics the night before to the intermod frequencies often works well (occasionally you need to change one or two if there is another crew filming nearby) as here in the UK the frequency range that our radiomics operate within is not crowded like the US with non-radiomic RF (tv transmitters, car alarms etc) as we are to believe is the case in the US. I look forward to hearing the availability of the SR modification and the publishing of a reliable Lectrosonic intermod frequency plan for block 606. Regards Matt

Great!

Hi Larry, Will these modifications be available to those of us that have already invested in UK 606 SR receivers?

Having done a similar show here in the UK, what we ended up doing was putting a portable VT deck (which has four audio inputs and timecode) in the boot. That way, both the video and audio were sync'd so the edit were happy. We were happy as it came out of the video budget! Just an idea...

No they sadly don't make it but agree I would also like such a product but I think a single receiver unit (that can be battery powered) might have a more generic use. I wander if you could set the Lectro TX to transmit in IFB mode and the SR receivers in IFB mode so that you could also tune in the R1a units?

More information on the new AD701 can be found here http://www.soundkit....velopments.html AD071 compact ENG mixer - Mounting Plates Bundle This mixer from Audio Developments has been designed for a variety of applications. However, its small size (13.5x9.5x4.0cm) and low weight (400gm), lends itself to being mounted on a camera or attached to a belt. It has 3 inputs and two outputs with limiters on microphone inputs and the main outputs. This is available in two configurations; a one microphone plus two line inputs or three microphone/line inputs. It is capable of being set and left to process the audio. We sell the Mic/Line input version as a norm due to its flexibility. There are two little bits of metal work that can be used to sandwich this nifty mixer between your tripod and camera. These are included in this bundle.

That is a little reassuring. Going to review files now wrapped. I would appreciate it if you could keep me updated with what they report back.

Yes and No, I'm upset that iPower no longer make AA's (like their awesome 9v batts) for my Lectro SMDB's

I've not had the opportunity to review any files. Will they be corrupt?

I'm currently on a shoot and my 788Thas just locked up. We have been filming for around 10 hours pretty continuously. The recorder is running 2.15 firmware. I am recording to the internal SSD and CF card as well as external FireWire 800 drive. I had to remove the external 12v power and the internal battery and reboot. The recorder is on a cart so has plenty of cool air around it so heat shouldn't be the issue. Weird! Annoying!!

I agree with an earlier post recommending the Audio Developments line of mixers. I have been using an AD146 with directouts into my 788 for a while now - actually I'm on a show now with this exact rig! The AD desks sound great and there are they often pop up on Bblist and eBay. AD may even have some second hand units available? They fit nicely on a sound cart and require standard 12v power but the other consideration of course is a CL9?

Do all of the AA's mentioned above fit in the Lectro SMDB transmitter? I've had a few batteries that are two big and get stuck!

I hope I'm not breaking the forum rules, I answered a similar topic with the following; I would like to firstly preface my two penny's worth with "I think Audio Ltd 2020/2040 range are without question the best sounding radiomics on the market today". I have been an Audio Ltd radiomic owner (6x2020's) since being freelance and a user for over a decade (since my staff days). I have taken them around the world where they have performed admirably and rarely let me down so when it came to considering which radiomics to replace my 2020's (thanks to the UK's decision to discontinue the availability of channel 69 in 2012) the 2040's were a obvious first choice. There are many obvious benefits such as the use of the same 6-pin lemo connector (so no need to rewire all my mics or replace any input/output cables), the sonic quality is without question, power consumption is good and build quality is above average (with exception of the rx battery clip but better than found on the 2020's). However ... There were a number of issues that made me pause for thought. Were Audio Ltd planning to release a new 2060 model as the 2040's showing its age when compared to the competition (lack of slot in rx for use as a camera hop, no duel receiver model, no on board display, can't ramp power output above 50mW) but it was mainly the infra-red remote and lack of switches! I spent a morning up at Audio Ltd with a recordist friend where they demonstrated the 2040's and the new en2's for us. It became clear that a 2060 model wasn't going to arrive soon - to address the features we wanted to see as well as the short comings we highlighted with the 2040's - as they concentrate on the launch of the new en2 range. I will admit that I was impressed with the new menu system found in the en2. It is easy to use (even with gloves on as is often that case when on location in the UK between Sep-Mar!) and the new oled screen is visible even in a dark studio but in my opinion didn't stand upto to the sonic quality of the 2040 or 2020 when side-by-side (which is understandable as why would they want to damage sales of their more expensive range). The en2's sounded to me better than a Sennheiser G3 but not as good as a Lectrosonic and having used them 'in anger' on one or two shows (reality/actuality) more recently the difference is clear. The other point worth mentioning is due to the low power output (35mW) it has had a knock on effect on the range when compared to more expensive radiomics. BUT being fair to the en2, it was never designed as a replacement for the 2040 and for its price I can see it being a good choice for budding recordists or eng cameraman that needs to do his own sound. After deliberating long and hard and testing other brands and models of radiomic, I eventually went with Lectrosonics SMDB transmitters and SR receivers (a choice I know many other UK recordists are making). Are they the perfect radiomic... no, but in my opinion best meet my requirements as a jobbing PSC recordist/mixer. They offer the flexibility of also being a camera hop, hardly weigh anything in my mixer bag (even in a Quadpack), compact in size, cost-effective, and can even be controlled via my iPhone. But the best reason is there is no infra-red controller! I dare say I'm opening myself upto all kinds of replies but at the end of the day my recommendation is field test all the options out there and make the best decision for you and not just go for the obvious choice.

The SMB/SMDB transmitters (European version of the SMA's) http://www.lectrosonics.com/europe/en/Transmitters/smdb.html

Absolutely Richard!

Other rental houses in London include Ian Coles at Visual Impact. www.visuals.co.uk

Yes I'd recommend you hire kit for the first few months to see what kind of gear your jobs require. £3,500 sounds a lot but in gear terms doesn't stretch very far especially when you include VAT (unless you're already VAT registered). When you are happy with the gear you need I wouldn't discount second hand gear from eBay or Bblist.co.uk. Remember a basic kit doesn't just include a boommic, boom pole, mixer, mixer bag, headphones, run bag and two radiomic kits... a client will expect you to provide all the cables that link these pieces of kit including camera umbilicals, camera tails and XLR cables. Also, don't forget about spares!

Great thanks for the quick reply. I'll take a look.

As a recent convert to Lectrosonics radiomics, can anyone recommend a brand of rechargeable AA's for use with SMDB transmitters? I've tried Camlink but with mixed results so far... Thanks