ramallo

Me too, more natural sound. In this test for my taste the Schoeps is a bit nasal

Rycote baseball + Rycote Invision 6

Nice, I have a SX-R4 that I sent to repair the past year, and Sonosax was unable to repair it, the USB won't work and still remain as it

Si eres buen operador de pértiga, en Madrid puedes conseguir trabajo fácilmente, especialmente para plataformas y televisiones If you're a good boom pole operator, in Madrid you can get a job easily, in streamers or TV Good luck Suso

-The SXR4 record all the channels to the CF -The sound is very nice (I prefer it than the new unit), but have the limiters always engaged -The worse part is the lack of repair, I had a unit with a problem with the USB, Sonosax was unable to repair my machine (I sold it)

Yes, are the same capsules

Nomad/NoVa + Oasis Deva24 + Mix16 Aaton Cantar + Cantarem 2

Is the same garden at the same hour but no same time (Only a pair of mics) (Consecutive recordings), just an ambience for have a idea about his sound (For stereo ambience). The microphones was a pair of DPA 4011 (matched pair) I choosed the Maxx over the Sonosax

I did a test with a Maxx, a Sonosax SX R4+ and a SD 722 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CCWJ9z4ZUuTfUADumHV4ec8jLrBvjxWN/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UCDAC7oxoffZIVgNrmFuc7aecXcEXZ0W/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/14eRSRjxDQ_Z_lKyFqApwcYgYKd3iGG4q/view?usp=sharing

The Maxx have a nice preamps, quiet and good sounding (On par with Sonosax IMMO), but have a hardwired low cut (not very aggressive), and no so much gain. The Nomad have a very aggressive high pass, IMMO was designed with dialogue recording in mind. If you have plans for recording dialogs both are great. For FX or music, the Maxx is better option Best

No big phase issues, mainly is a coincident technique (quasy)

No, You can get some b format here https://freesound.org/people/ramagochi/ and try The first one is converted to 5.1 https://freesound.org/people/ramagochi/sounds/525033/ Done with Harpex-X

You need the TouchstonePro for do a connection with the RF Explorer, and this program can export a CSV file for the WWB This is a scan imported in the WWB

I'm using a computer, RF Explorer and Wireless Work Bench (And Touchstone pro for export the scans)

I found the NT -FS1 noiser than the SPS200, but less than the Ambeo