Jump to content

ramallo

Members
  • Posts

    635
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by ramallo

  1. The Oasis work with the NoVa perfectly (I have both) I did not mean exactly that the Aria had a large size, it seems small, I meant that people expected a Mix8 II, something like the Sonosax, small size and price. Maybe I explained it wrong. Probably if they had taken an inexpensive and small surface, I would buy it to carry a very small setup with the NoVa, at that price I am comfortable with the Oasis. Best Regards
  2. Nice unit but IMMO is a wrong move. I venture to say that everyone expected a MIX8 II, small, like the SX-LC8 + from Sonosax and even a price similar to that of Sonosax (1400), something with 8 faders + 8 trims, pfl and basic transport (REC + STOP). But they have produced something very cool but at an exorbitant price, which with the addons is more expensive than an Oasis, and IMMO the Oasis give more. I don't understand that move Best
  3. https://wisycom.com/products/product/mat288/ https://wisycom.com/products/product/mat244/
  4. Nomad is tiny (also nice for a cart), have neverclip, have zaxnet, have auto trim, have Oasis possibility, have Touch, individual on/low radios, multiple trims to one fader. Deva have touch screen and a nicier file control. IMMO the Nomad is a much modern machine
  5. In Europe is more easily to find RG213 than the RG8 (both are close), up to 30m without amplification (500MHz) (5dB loss), but 11mm of diameter. The LMR240 is nice, is a bit thicker than the RG58 (6,1mm instead 5,5mm of the RG58), up to 22m for a 5dB (550MHz), but is a bit stifther than the RG58
  6. 1/4 or more wavelength, if you have a cancellation in one antenna the other is 90º displaced
  7. Me too, more natural sound. In this test for my taste the Schoeps is a bit nasal
  8. Rycote baseball + Rycote Invision 6
  9. Nice, I have a SX-R4 that I sent to repair the past year, and Sonosax was unable to repair it, the USB won't work and still remain as it
  10. Si eres buen operador de pértiga, en Madrid puedes conseguir trabajo fácilmente, especialmente para plataformas y televisiones If you're a good boom pole operator, in Madrid you can get a job easily, in streamers or TV Good luck Suso
  11. -The SXR4 record all the channels to the CF -The sound is very nice (I prefer it than the new unit), but have the limiters always engaged -The worse part is the lack of repair, I had a unit with a problem with the USB, Sonosax was unable to repair my machine (I sold it)
  12. Nomad/NoVa + Oasis Deva24 + Mix16 Aaton Cantar + Cantarem 2
  13. Is the same garden at the same hour but no same time (Only a pair of mics) (Consecutive recordings), just an ambience for have a idea about his sound (For stereo ambience). The microphones was a pair of DPA 4011 (matched pair) I choosed the Maxx over the Sonosax
  14. I did a test with a Maxx, a Sonosax SX R4+ and a SD 722 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CCWJ9z4ZUuTfUADumHV4ec8jLrBvjxWN/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UCDAC7oxoffZIVgNrmFuc7aecXcEXZ0W/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/14eRSRjxDQ_Z_lKyFqApwcYgYKd3iGG4q/view?usp=sharing
  15. The Maxx have a nice preamps, quiet and good sounding (On par with Sonosax IMMO), but have a hardwired low cut (not very aggressive), and no so much gain. The Nomad have a very aggressive high pass, IMMO was designed with dialogue recording in mind. If you have plans for recording dialogs both are great. For FX or music, the Maxx is better option Best
  16. No big phase issues, mainly is a coincident technique (quasy)
  17. No, You can get some b format here https://freesound.org/people/ramagochi/ and try The first one is converted to 5.1 https://freesound.org/people/ramagochi/sounds/525033/ Done with Harpex-X
  18. You need the TouchstonePro for do a connection with the RF Explorer, and this program can export a CSV file for the WWB This is a scan imported in the WWB
  19. I'm using a computer, RF Explorer and Wireless Work Bench (And Touchstone pro for export the scans)
  20. I found the NT -FS1 noiser than the SPS200, but less than the Ambeo
  21. I guess that nothing special, the membranes of these mics are made from nickel and tested in factory at 150 Cº for aging https://www.bksv.com/media/doc/Bp0100.pdf
  22. I said far, not close (I have both), but the NT-SF1 is nice for the price (the SPS200 cost three times more)
  23. I also work with Ms. Preston, in his last film, sad. RIP
  24. Rode still selling Soundfield, as as you suggest, the NT-SF1 is far from the real Soundfield SPS200, but is cheap and IMMO better than Ambeo
×
×
  • Create New...