Jump to content

Wyatt Tuzo

Members
  • Posts

    694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Wyatt Tuzo

  1. Thank you. I think I got the answer I was looking for around the 20min mark (if anyone else is wondering)
  2. Just curious, is there anywhere we can see an image or video of this, in an ear, from the side? It feels like the earpiece may stand a bit proud for my needs, but I’m only guessing
  3. You're very welcome, Martin! One thing I've been hoping to follow up on... after the conversation with Vin above, I decided to try snipping the SMA's off of my second mod and the traces flew right off. This is really a job for a focused hot-air rework station. The ground pads are extremely weak on this board. Fair warning. In other news, I was thinking of machining notch for the db25 risers for the 1st position receivers, but decided to 3d print some instead. I'd be happy to share the file, if anyone needs, but know that I am no expert in 3d rendering
  4. I had a very, very similar need on a show last year. Fortunately, I didn't have the added headache of the Roger shortcomings. One day, we'll trade war stories.
  5. Good angle, Vin. Maybe I'll give that a shot with my next one. One thing that I didn't mention in my original post that is worth noting, is that the SMA connectors are soldered to both the top and bottom of the PCB, for a total of 5 connection points. This would leave hot air desoldering, your method, or a product called chip-quick (which reduces the melting point of solder in order to give you more work time) as options. The hot air is tricky without a microscope on account of the circuit near the SMA's, leaving the last two as the most practical to execute at home
  6. Step 6: Finishing/testing Time to measure again! Two things to note: I realize that the curser here is at 520 Mhz, and not 522 as above, but this is good enough to give me a picture and tell me that everything is working as expected. Also, I think the the greater difference in Ant. B from the before may point to something being off in my before measurement . I feel like it's more likely that the two antennas legs were not measuring off by a full dB from the factory, and that the after is probably more indicative of what to expect from the unit. So, I'm happy with this: Note the Excess cable that I left inside the unit. I did this for a few reasons: it allowed me to work more comfortably, I didn't have to be quite as precious with my cable measurements, the slack takes any potential strain off the connection to the PCB, and if I ever have a problematic connection, I have extra cable that I can just pull through and re-terminate: Viola!: I haven't had a chance to pass audio yet, as I left all of my transmitters at my office, but a receiver tone-up is working as it should on all DANTE outputs. I think this means I can move forward with finalizing my transition now (once ADX5D units become available again). My plan is to go through this process for a second A10, giving me 16 channels of Axient in 2u! One more thing to mention: I'm going to have to mill a notch out of the DB25 riser for A10 position 1 in order to accommodate the power switch. Fortunately, the receiver will sit just above the switch bezel (as I'd like to keep the bezel to prevent accidental bumping) Whew!
  7. Step 5: Making all connections I decided to cover the neighboring circuit with Kapton for some added insulation prior to adding my RF leads: After meticulously making my RF leads (using plenty of heat shrink for further insulation), I decided to add more Kapton tape, both over the connections, and down the PCB arms a bit, to act as a strain relief: Next, I re-installed the receiver slots so I could secure the faceplate to the front of the chassis (the receiver slots attach via screws under the faceplate, as well as inside the unit). Note: I used blue thread lock on EVERYTHING while reassembling. This is going to bounce around on a cart, on a truck, hopefully for a few years to come. I didn't want anything shaking loose: Next, I fed the other end of the RF leads through the grommets, and terminated with RA SMA connectors:
  8. Step 4: Preparing the PCB and faceplate: As the grommets don't sit completely flush with the faceplate, and this will need to mount directly against the chassis front, I'm unfortunately going to have to drill out the chassis to accommodate the outer diameter of the grommets: The grommets measure 5/16... I'm going to drill the chassis holes to 11/32. I take extra care de-burring these holes after, and blowing out any potential stray metal filings... that would be the last thing I'd want bouncing around in here once I'm finished: I don't have photos of the next step (removing the SMA connectors) because I decided to take the board to a specialist for that. I was too nervous given the proximity of the aforementioned circuit... Money well spent. Here is a pic of me cleaning the residual flux off the PCB afterward: Note that even the pro's pulled off a few solder pads in the process. Fortunately, they were just ground pads and I had enough to spare:
  9. Step 3: Pull everything out Carefully remove the DANTE board, then remove main PCB screws and DANTE card stand-offs: Remove receiver slots by gently pulling PCB away, then removing all screws: Look at those tiny 0402 sized SMD components directly next to the work area! My guess is that these are either for filtering or buffering.
  10. Step 1: The Plan You can see here how the SMA's prevent the receiver from mounting properly: Again, inspired by a discussion on FB, there seemed to be two possible ways I could go. I could A: Install DP25 spacers and custom fabricate receiver spacers that would make up for the extra distance to the chassis, or B: Replace the SMA jacks altogether. I thought I should have a look at option A first, as it would be the least destructive. After Some Dremeling, I was able to get the DB25 spacer to mate properly with the receiver backplate: While this would certainly have been the easier course, there were a few things that didn't quite sit right with me. Firstly, the receivers ended up standing a bit too proud of the chassis for my taste, and second, the DB25 spacers would have no way of securing to either the chassis or the Rx unit. As a part of the plan here is to be able to pull receivers to go into a bag when needed, I felt this was a potential problem. Let's go with Option B Step 2: Proof of concept I decided to replace the SMA connectors with lengths of RG-174 that would home-run to the PCB. I added grommets for safety and fit: With everything looking good so far, I decided to take a quick measurement of the RF from the antenna input to the SMA connectors for comparison later (**Note the Blue line and value, aprox 2 and 3 dB of gain, respectively, within the unit at 522Mhz. There is no significance to the freq I was metering, it just happens to be where the curser was at the time): That was supposed to say "Ant. B", but my phone autocorrected and I just noticed. I'm going to live with it.
  11. So... I started my transition into the Axient Digital line earlier last year. For months I had been sitting on a number of transmitters, in the hopes of a receiver solution that would suit the layout of my cart. I live and work in New York, and thus I've always valued having as mobile, and lightweight a cart as I can get away with, and the full-sized Shure rack receivers just weren't going to work with my setup. Further considerations of mine were: The hope for DANTE integration, and a relatively high channel density (higher than Shure's AD4Q, at least). When the ADX5D was announced, I figured all of my problems would be solved by pairing these with the Audio Ltd (now Sound Devices) A10 Rack. Unfortunately, the Shure receivers were just a bit too physically broad for the A10's SMA antenna spacing. Inspired by a recent Facebook discussion on the Axient Users Group, I decided to look into modding an A10 Rack to accommodate the ADX5D. I thought I'd share my process in the event anyone is curious... I'm going to spread this out over a couple of separate posts below. Please know that this modification is not for the faint of heart. I feel pretty confident working with electronics, and I was still triple and quadruple checking everything as I went. While this may present as a how-to, I am not looking to encourage anyone to try this for themselves. I accept no responsibility for your choice (should you attempt this), and you will most certainly void your warranty. Here goes...
  12. I have a LOT of information forthcoming (Next week-ish?). Stay tuned. I will likely start a new thread.
  13. While I'd still prefer to remove the SMA's altogether, another option that is presenting would be to machine a custom slot-receiver spacer with cut-outs to accommodate the SMA connectors. This will require an internal DB25 spacer as well (as seen here): Again, my preferred route would be to remove the SMA connectors altogether, but I need to make sure that I am able to maintain the RF connection integrity. If the SMA's are PCB mounted directly behind the faceplate, this doesn't leave me with many options for strain relief when replacing with cables. So that, in essence, is what I'm trying to get to the bottom of if anyone has information that could help. SD has (understandably) denied my request for technical drawings or photos. Thanks!
  14. As published, the ADX5D's faceplate is 88mm wide, while the a10 rack has an available 84.4mm between SMA connectors. Losing the SMA's should make up the needed 3.6mm. I'm just curious as to the internal topology before going out on a limb for purchase.
  15. This may be a long shot, but I'm looking for someone who may have easy access to an A10 Rack (that is currently not in a rack), who would be willing to remove the top cover to photograph the inside. Specifically, I'm thinking of embarking on a mod to make one of these accommodate the Shure ADX5D's, but would like to see the internal routing of the antenna distro before buying. This modification would involve removing the chassis-mounted SMA connectors and replacing them with grommets, allowing direct RF leads to be run in their place. Thanks in advance! Wyatt
  16. If he has a 2 input focusrite, he likely also has outputs on it. Use this to feed your return
  17. How are you getting sound IN to VTR?
  18. Can you feed the coms from the Qtake? This will ensure that sound is synced to the picture delay. The only time this will be problematic, is if the director is close enough to set to hear the difference in the bleed through their cans +the delayed feed. This would be a problem with the added delay approach as well though
  19. I would agree that, personally, I feel more is made of this than is really there. I juuuust moved from my analog board to a control surface. I didn’t worry about wireless latency then, and I don’t worry about it now. If what we’re talking about, and really worrying about, is phase correlation in the time domain, it’s a bit of a moot point, as both talent and the boom are constantly moving. Further to this point, if we know that sound moves at aprox 1ms/ft, then the difference In arrival time between a wireless mic with a 3ms delay, and that of the hardlined boom at a distance is even smaller. If we start adjusting delay times to accommodate for the wireless latency, it’s really just moving the potential problem (not removing it). That said, if you are mixing wireless brands and/or technologies, I could see wanting to get all of your wireless latencies adjusted to match one another. I suppose it’s possible that this is more of an issue for some in certain facets of our industry than mine. I rarely find myself mixing booms and wires 1:1 for any length of time. I’m generally just grabbing a line or chunk of dialog that the boom can’t get to…Even here, my finger is constantly riding the boom level while listening for both background consistency and combing between sources. If I hear a problem, a simple polarity flip usually corrects for it. That’s my experience, but the physics doesn’t change.
  20. Saw this yesterday. What a sad day for the industry! There were very few like him, then or now... A deep talent and generous spirit.
  21. To add to the above post... as an alternative to drilling the axle for use with a cotter pin, you could use a “shaft collar” to retain everything.
  22. Heavy duty 2" velcro. Done. You'll get the added benefit of a touch of shock absorption as well. No need to over think these things
  23. As a Secret Santa gift one year, a Camera Op picked me and had a custom shirt made... Black T-shirt... the front said "F**k Sound", and the back "No, F**k You!"). I added the asterisks for this post. Needless to say, I never wore that one on set. While I appreciated that his heart was in the right place, It was more aggressive than passive aggressive.
  24. I would honestly be surprised to see this take off on “big jobs” either. I would assume the studios would have security concerns in sending sensitive footage over a network. I think, as someone alluded to earlier, something like news could be a viable application. Maybe studio sitcoms ? Certain commercials?
  25. A more thorough understanding of signal follow would be a good start. No, this shouldn’t be hard. Re-terminate both ends as desired. Be mindful of continuity.
×
×
  • Create New...