Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bax

  • Rank
  • Birthday 11/17/1976

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Location
  • Interests
    Music, motorcycle, ,DIY, electronics, voyages
  • About
    His dedicated to the creation of emotional and evocative sound prints through the creative use of high quality audio gear. He aims to create sound that communicate the directors vision and always look-out for the best possible result.
  • Interested in Sound for Picture

Recent Profile Visitors

1,054 profile views
  1. Hi Darryl, I've just send you an email ;-) PS: What is the length of the coax cables coming with the kit ? Bax.
  2. The main modifications were: 1: Doing solid attachement of the top case to the main body 2: Attaching Manfrotto clamps to the sides of the top case with internal reinforcement 3: Changing the original "all plastic made" wheels with a far more solid (and handy) ones with flat free solid rubber tire. 4: Attaching Manfrotto cable or headphone holders 5: Attaching a dual boom holder système (Quickfist) Thanks for the inspiration to all and hope this will inspire others ;-) Some "in condition" photos :
  3. Hi to all fellows of this topic ;-) I have checked this topic a will ago finding my self working to a very similar type of case (Stanley) ! In fact, the inspiring model for me has been the "Stanley Cantilever Fatmax" model. This model finally wasn't my final choice for two main reasons: 1: Not as hardened and secure as i wanted to be. 2: The cantilever opening system needs some "space" around the case to be fully opened... I finally choose the "Stanley Bi-Composite" case made of galvanized steel, aluminium and of coarse... plastic ! There are to types available apparently, with one or two dr
  4. Is this feature common to all Sound Devices TC capable recorders ? Thanks Matt for this info ;-)
  5. I had this warning about the date too once... but the date was fine. ? I just said, OK and had no problem since then...
  6. Nick, Siddho, This are my observations, - A hard reset seems to work for the keyboard issue. - I think though that a "factory default" procedure being the best solution cause the new firmware adds more functions... This can be clearly observe comparing the .XML files generated. Thanks. Bax.
  7. Hi there, After my recent update to the v1.04 SD firmware for my 633 mixer, my Rii wi-fi keyboard dont responds any more... Does anybody out there had this kind of problem with this keyboard or other model ? Does this problem concerns the SD664 mixer too ? Thank you in advance for your help. Bax.
  8. studiomprd: this is not about devices, but about the technologies... maybe, maybe not... studiomprd: maybe you have unreasonable expectations? maybe, maybe not... It fits all i agree I didn't have the opportunity to check this 2.4GHz bleed with other audio mixer manufacturers yet because i mostly use my own gear. I will try to do that in the near future. It seems that Zaxcom are aware of this particular problem with the SD633 mixer. (mail from the Zaxcom support) Jeff, studiomprd, i realize that this is probably not about a gear only issue and i strongly believe that
  9. Hi there, I would like here to share with you my experiences working with the combination of the SD633 mixer and the IFB200 Transceiver and especially the interference issues i had with. First of all, i must say that the SD633 and IFB200 are fantastic tools. The engineering behind the SD633 is huge as is the potential of the IFB200. But, the combination of this two devices is not as stress-free as we could most of as expect. Indeed, it is obvious to me today that, the SD633 and the MixPreD (witch are the two only mixers i tested until now) are not very tolerant in 2.4GHz radiatio
  10. Brian, I don't want to extend to this post the interference issue between the IFB200 and SD633 to much. I will post especially about that, soon. But briefly, i am talking about some digital kind of disturbances i receive from the SD633. It seems that the SD633 is very sensitive to the proximity AND direction of the omni 2.4GHz antenna of the IFB200.
  11. Jack, Did you try to do the test of the distance ? 1: Try to step down the power to the min (Lev 1) 2: Check the max distance (this should be something like 8-10 meters) 3: Reboot 4: Re-check the max distance (this should be now back to the max, 40+ meters)
  12. Hi there, I'm writing this post because having recently been confronted to interference problems with my SD633 and IFB200 combination due to the 2,4GHz technology of Zaxnet (i would soon post a topic about that), i found this: If you try to change the IFB transmission power from the extended menu to anything but "7" (which is the Max level) coming back to the main menu and/or reboot the device cancels this change !? Means that, the max IFB transmission power is re-loaded again. But, coming back to the transmission power menu (advanced menu), the number don't change to "7" but still
  13. Hello everybody, I'm a new comer to this forum and glad to make my first contribution. I've been impressed from the quality and quantity of the informations going thru this site and hope that this topic would help DIY users avoid my interrogations about phase issues i went thru making my own 2xTA3F to TA5F inject cable feeding my Zaxcom IFB200. So, despite the wiring diagram for the analog input presented on the manual (page20) of the Zaxcom IFB200 here is the one you should follow: - Pin2 of the Out of mixer XLR (or TA3) L goes to: Pin 2 of TA5F on IFB200 - Pin3 of th
  • Create New...