Jump to content

New Equipment Testing.... ?


mikefilosa

Recommended Posts

Not specific to any one thing, but I have read, over the last several weeks, about more than a few instances of brand new tools / equipment going awry on "day one" in the field - thus alarming posts about how difficult the day was.....

My sincere hope is that equipment that arrives on the doorstep one night has been fired up, tested, and investigated (manual?) before it goes to work, dare I say, the next morning.

I recommend to anyone to use all tools at one's disposal to test gear out first - including a long-term powered-up period to check on / for heat issues and power consumption. And equipment that arrives back from repair also needs a thorough going-over to make sure the problem is corrected and the piece of kit is dependable.

I would hate to see stuff / brands out there being even mildly maligned over what might honestly be first-day jitters ....

MF

PS

(even moreso for camera - it would take both hands to count the number of shoot days over the last ten years where I observed the camera - my primary sound recorder - actually being removed from it's brand new box for the very first time..... yikes! )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Michael,

I have mentioned this stuff before...

"Infant Mortality" happens, CRAP happens, and we must be good scouts: "be prepared".

that old motto involves a lot of what is being said here: preparation and testing time, looking things up, knowing your tools (and while the camera folks should know their tools, it seems prudent that we also know their tools for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also a heavy responsibility on the manufacurer to thoroughly test the equipment before it goes out the door. Quality control is an important part of the process and sample testing or simply powering up the unit prior to shipping leaves a lot to chance...and forces the buyer to be the tester/troubleshooter.

www.matthewfreed.com

Production Sound Mixing for TV, Films, and Commercials

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also a heavy responsibility on the manufacurer to thoroughly test the equipment before it goes out the door. Quality control is an important part of the process....

True - but there is no excuse for not thoroughly testing and familiarizing yourself with any new piece of gear before taking it out in the field. Many issues be it either operator error or something that didn't get QC correctly can easily be solved in the comfort of your home. Most new gear is heavily menu driven and in the heat of the battle while everyone is waiting for sound you can look like a complete jackass. It is your name and reputation on the line. Case in point I was brought in on a job to replace a mixer recently because of a myriad of sound issues. On set it was mentioned that the person I replaced kept on having to pull out the manual and calling people in regard to his "new" gear.

So if the issue was that there was something that was malfunction - he would have know this by testing and knowing his gear. Or even if it was just operator error because he wasn't familiar with his gear he could have solved this before ruining his reputation and destroying a full day of production.

So test and test and know your gear - remember you are only as good as your last job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" True - but there is no excuse for not thoroughly testing and familiarizing yourself with any new piece of gear before taking it out in the field "

absolutely true: There is no excuse for not thoroughly testing and familiarizing yourself with any new piece of gear before taking it out in the field... So test and test and know your gear

Thanks, Jack! ::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All for testing before using, but I've seen a DP and two AC's standing around a new camera trying to figure it out when it just shut down. So the sound person is replaced quickly because they were seen asking questions, why weren't new DP's and AC's on the job the next day for the bad camera day? Guess sound looks sooooo easy to do and should never have any problems. After all, the soundie just sits there watching the pretty lights and might move a pot every now and then.

(Your productions may be different.)

Scott......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the sound person is replaced quickly because they were seen asking questions. . .

If you are referring to the shoot I was called in on its my understanding that it was way more than just "asking questions".

It was everything from not being able to get his slate to sync, to issues with his recorder - which cumulated with him going to the producer halfway through the day and saying that everything shot up to that point had to be re-done.

What was the issue - I have no idea - but seems to me a complete run through with his gear prior to the shoot may have yielded different results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack, your event got me to write the reply, but wasn't to single it out. Just a comment to show how maybe a sound person might be removed before the camera crew. Even easier if the sound department is one man band. I worked on a "movie" a couple of years ago where I day played in the G&E department. I showed up on day 5 of 12 and they were looking for their 5th sound team and were trying to ship in equipment to use. Now this doesn't happen often, but it can. Some seem like sound is an easy position and either think anybody can do it or they don't need to pay much for the person doing the job. Painting idea with a broad brush here and a little tongue in check.

Scott...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack's story is an excellent cautionary tale, though of course there may be more to it.

Sure, we have spent years on this, and other forums, (all the way back to Courtney's BBS, and before that in plenty of conversations, bemoaning the fact that production sound is the low class part of the production, and as Rodney always said, we don't get no respect. I really do not expect that to get better as the toys keep getting smaller and more accessible (read:cheaper)...

Our job is to find the ways, and learn to deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I'm all for playing around with a new piece of gear to get famaliar with it prior to using it on set. What I don't find acceptable is receiving a new piece of gear that is DOA or has some other major malfunction right off the bat.

I received a wireless receiver a while back that evidently had some major malfunctions from day one. It had to be sent back to the manufacturer for repair. I don't enjoy spending more money and time shipping gear back that should have been tested before leaving the manufacturer.

I received another wireless unit recently after waiting 3 months for it and there seems to be something not right with this one either. The manufacturer said I could return it for them to evaluate. Perfect. Let me ship it right back to you for you to do the testing that should have been done in the first place. And in the mean time I will be without 2 channels of wireless in the middle of my 3 month shoot.

There is a difference between receiving a piece of gear that you are unfamiliar with and receiving defective equipment...again.

www.matthewfreed.com

Production Sound Mixing for TV, Films, and Commercials

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...

CRAP happens.

many times your dealer can help...

Crap does happen but it seems to happen all too often these days. Not only sound gear but video gear as well. So many examples of products not working right out of the box lately. I think QC is being sacrificed at the altar of getting the latest, most innovative products out there without proper testing at the factory before delivery.

If you have a good dealer (Pro-Sound for example) they can be a big help getting you through the crisis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...