Jack Norflus Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I'm gonna wager it's possible to use a combination of the 4 analogue inputs and AES inputs to get to 6 ISO's but NOT possible to use the returns like you can on Nomad. Justin you win. The camera returns are not routable to the record tracks. Not sure why you would need it anyway - since more likely than not you will be sending the camera your mix busses. And since your mix busses are routable to the record tracks there is no need to record them as returns as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbois Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I don't remember if i asked this before, yet is there a digital fader for the 2- aes digital inputs? Thank you ....if i was to use all 6 tracks as isos? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundslikejustin Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Justin you win. The camera returns are not routable to the record tracks. Not sure why you would need it anyway - since more likely than not you will be sending the camera your mix busses. And since your mix busses are routable to the record tracks there is no need to record them as returns as well. Good to know. I meant more in the fashion that on Nomad you can use them as an additional 4 analogue inputs rather than returns. I don't remember if i asked this before, yet is there a digital fader for the 2- aes digital inputs? There are virtual faders for any input if you are using more than 4. There are only AES inputs IF you order the AES input option, otherwise it's just outputs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJBerto Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 i thought for sure this would possible, like on a 302. Justin you win. The camera returns are not routable to the record tracks. Not sure why you would need it anyway - since more likely than not you will be sending the camera your mix busses. And since your mix busses are routable to the record tracks there is no need to record them as returns as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Norflus Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I don't remember if i asked this before, yet is there a digital fader for the 2- aes digital inputs? The AES option gives you 4 digital inputs on 2 AES pairs. Maxx gives you several choices on how to mix them. You can assign any one of the digital input to any one of the hardware faders and fade them that way. You also have a virtual fader screen - like Nomad has. Plus you have the ability to mix and trim the digital inputs from the ENG screen - the same as mixing inputs 7 thru 10 on Nomad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadoStefanov Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 This is a very good news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadoStefanov Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Not that I would want to use 6 ISO on maxx " i would reach for a nomad" but for people that only own a maxx will be cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Norflus Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Not that I would want to use 6 ISO on maxx " i would reach for a nomad" but for people that only own a maxx will be cool. Its all about options, flexibility and turning a product that pushes the limits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macrecorder Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Not sure why you would need it anyway - since more likely than not you will be sending the camera your mix busses. And since your mix busses are routable to the record tracks there is no need to record them as returns as well. No, of course there would be no point in recording return from camera. I was thinking of more like the 302, where you can press the return buss into service as an extra line level analogue in, when it is required. The advantage of that would be that you would not need radios or a second mixer with AES outputs. It's been tremendously useful on the 302. Flexibility, yes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJBerto Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 No, of course there would be no point in recording return from camera. I was thinking of more like the 302, where you can press the return buss into service as an extra line level analogue in, when it is required. The advantage of that would be that you would not need radios or a second mixer with AES outputs. It's been tremendously useful on the 302. Flexibility, yes! I was really hoping this would be possible. ~$3200 for a Maxx with 6 channel recording and AES input options. Add 900 for a mix-preD and we're in Nomad territory. I would seldom need this, but it would be a god-send in a pinch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundslikejustin Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Reading the manual re track count vs sample rate: Sample rates over 48048 are limited to 4 tracks or less. How many tracks are enabled with 96khz recording? How many with 192khz? I'm also curious if 3 or 4 tracks are possible at 192khz for surround recording. Only 2 tracks at 192khz: Got someone to test the unit for me at SMPTE in Sydney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Only 2 tracks at 192khz: Got someone to test the unit for me at SMPTE in Sydney. Thanks Justin. There goes my plans for a 192k DMS light weight field recorder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundslikejustin Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Thanks Justin. There goes my plans for a 192k DMS light weight field recorder. same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate C Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Had a look at Maxx today at SMPTE. A couple of things I noticed, it doesn't seem to have a dedicated track enable option. Rather it uses the card bus. A choice of input 1, 2, 3, 4, out 1, out 2 or None. Making it a little slower than the records enable page. Nor does it seem to have a short cut to the meta data page. These are the two most common menu items I find my self using after my rig is set up for the day on the Nomad. I may have simply missed something in all fairness. Chris was busy helping someone else so I didn't ask any further questions. All said I found myself looking at bags afterwards thinking 'What would Maxx look good in." Oh and I shouldn't have looked at Zax wireless. I can see another near purchase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundslikejustin Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 All said I found myself looking at bags afterwards thinking 'What would Maxx look good in." Fits in a PS607 if you use right-angle connectors / AES In. There's a photo on the Facebook page from PSS in NYC I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnpaul215 Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 No, of course there would be no point in recording return from camera. I was thinking of more like the 302, where you can press the return buss into service as an extra line level analogue in, when it is required. The advantage of that would be that you would not need radios or a second mixer with AES outputs. It's been tremendously useful on the 302. Flexibility, yes! Though with a Nomad the TA5 "return" input is balanced, and the 302 is an unbalanced minijack. The Nomad's TA5 return is nice because it's small and light. If you are using a QRX in the bag, you can get a single TA5-TA5 cable for 2 channels of audio, instead of 2 XLRs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Norflus Posted July 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Only 2 tracks at 192khz Actually 192kHz recording is still being optimized - so the final track count is still yet to be determined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Actually 192kHz recording is still being optimized - so the final track count is still yet to be determined. Here is my vote for at least 3 so I can do DMS at 192k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiomprd Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 I'll vote for 5.1 so I can do Native surround at 192kHzm though 7.1 would be better... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 I'll vote for 5.1 so I can do Native surround at 192kHzm though 7.1 would be better... Sarcastic comments like this are unnecessary and unwanted. You know it's a 4 track + mix bus recorder, making this sort of comment has no bearing on the conversation, and seems like your only aim is to be a nuisance, or condescend upon everything anyone says. Please stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiomprd Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 " no bearing on the conversation, " you are correct, it is not an election. so, how long do batteries run ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandering Ear Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 " no bearing on the conversation, " you are correct, it is not an election. so, how long do batteries run ?? So your problem is with my use of the word vote? As even you have stated, the manufacturers of the specialized equipment we use follow these conversations, and Zaxcom has proven to take the needs and desires of their customers seriously when designing their gear. As Jack mentioned the track count at 192k might not be finalized, so customer feedback in the form of votes could give them an idea of how many people would use that capability. It doesn't have to be an election to be useful info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Norflus Posted July 25, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 The plan is to have as many tracks available at 192 that Maxx can do. When Howy finishes doing the magic that he does we will know if Maxx will do 2,3,4,5 or even 6 track at 192. Stay tuned ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zack Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 And in what position in the magic deck does this card sit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbois Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 The plan is to have as many tracks available at 192 that Maxx can do. When Howy finishes doing the magic that he does we will know if Maxx will do 2,3,4,5 or even 6 track at 192. Stay tuned ... YES!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.