Jay Rose Posted January 9, 2014 Report Share Posted January 9, 2014 From my posting 1/5: "Camera/recorder files were ingested directly as output." Camera files were copied to my hard drive, then either run directly through RightMark and SpectraFoo software, or sent via AES/EBU to my digital ATB, or through a calibrated DAC to my analog ATB. Back in DV tape days, I'd capture the camera tape via FireWire and then treat the result as a file. I have run tests through camera headphone outputs, on occasion… but that's a totally different thing, and were mostly concerned with subjective naturalness and drive volume. The file/DV tests were totally objective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenZ Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 Wow! I stopped reading at page number 5. Anyway, Mark, excellent work describing this guy the workflow. What made me laugh is this though: The timecode syncs most of the time, but for example, the Red One is purely awful at keeping the timecode synced during a days shoot, it drifts a lot. So the guy has three cameras. Not the same models. His shittiest camera goes off sync and causes him issues and instead of saying: "next time I won't use this disfunctionning camera", he goes on a rampage and wants to invent the ultimate camera that will record sound, etc etc. Gosh, this guy is walking backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikewest Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Back to the topic! If sound was easy everyone would be doing it. mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.279748a58a2b862b7aa5f3b84126e232.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.