RadoStefanov Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 SIngle wireless module shell anytime soon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Trew Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 I just mod'd my unit. I found it very challenging fitting the RX12 into my petrol bag with the current Hirose power cable. I thought about getting a right angle hirose adapter but I believe I still would have had clearance issues. So, I went with SwitchCraft 761k (ground isolated connector) instead. It fits just fine now. =) If you're considering this mod you will have to drill the chassis on the RX12( 25/64 drill bit) to fit the larger diameter SwitchCraft. Instead of the 761K (2.5mm pin), consider using the S761 (2.0mm pin), for a long list of reasons. Here are a few of those reasons: The S761 is found in virtually every other pro audio device using a coaxial power plug. The 761K is used on Zaxcom devices that don't use 4-pin power connections, but Zaxcom is the only one. They chose this connector thinking it would be compatible with the BDS, not realizing that it was only the BDS box's outlet connectors. The 761K is the power OUTLET (not input) on the Remote Audio BDS (plus rip-offs), which was chosen because it wasn't used anywhere else in our industry and because the common power plug (2.0 pin) could not be accidentally plug into the BDS outlets. Also, the "K" designates a switchable ground connection (or isolation) that requires a long-shaft plug. Another potential problem is that a power cable with the 761K will plug into other devices - the majority of which use the 2.0mm center pin - but because the 761K is made for jacks with a 2.5mm center pin the connection will be intermittent at best. It's nearly impossible to tell the difference visually between the 761K and S761, so the fewer 2.5mm power input jacks for devices we use, the better. With all that in mind, since you already have the 761K mating jack installed, be sure to label the power cable for your modded RX12, with something like red shrink so it doesn't accidentally find it's way into other devices. gt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomboom Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 ... Speaking of red, these connectors can also be ordered in red... The 2.5mm long shaft 761K (black) is 766K (in red) - for BDS and zax rxs The 2.0mm short shaft S760K (black) is S765K (in red) - for Lectro and other gear... And just for reference as we are here, for the zax txs and other 2.5mm short shaft things, it's 760K in black / 765K in red. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadoStefanov Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 I was thinking about doing the opposite mod. Put hirose on my qrx200s qrx235 and micplexers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justanross Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 Has Zaxcom introduced any new recorder that accepts Dante? They seem invested in AES only, which has kept them limited to 8 AES channels. Sound Devices has embraced Dante and even Madi with their new Pix 970. Does Glenn have an answer to Zaxcom's design philosophy? Zaxcom doesn't play with others. But I'm willing to bet they're working on there own version of Dante. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Wexler Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 Zaxcom doesn't play with others. But I'm willing to bet they're working on there own version of Dante. Zaxcom plays quite nicely with others, thank you, but does not have any recorders or devices (yet) that utilize Dante network protocols. Zaxcom is NOT working on "their own version of Dante" but rather I imagine they will come out with devices that utilize Audinate's Dante protocols. This will insure that Zaxcom continues to play well with others (not withstanding Justan's personal opinion). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Blankenship Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 While I certainly agree it would have been nice for Zaxcom to have adapted more common power connector sizes, they are by no means alone in arbitrary connector choice. For example, on devices in my inventory I've counted no fewer than eleven different time code connectors used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justanross Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 Zaxcom plays quite nicely with others, thank you, but does not have any recorders or devices (yet) that utilize Dante network protocols. Zaxcom is NOT working on "their own version of Dante" but rather I imagine they will come out with devices that utilize Audinate's Dante protocols. This will insure that Zaxcom continues to play well with others (not withstanding Justan's personal opinion). #fanboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Wexler Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 Fanboy --- and proud of it! My comment, however, had nothing to do with being a fan, rather it was to correct the mis-conception that Zaxcom is working on "their own version of Dante". Had it been said something like: "most probably Zaxcom is working on implementing Dante in their next recorder or related products" I would not have had to say anything, fanboy or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Constantin Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 Zaxcom doesn't play with others. But I'm willing to bet they're working on there own version of Dante. This is not exactly from the horse's mouth, but fairly close (from the Deva 32 thread): I can safely say that that one of the features, amongst many other neat features, will be Dante. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Miramontes Posted January 18, 2015 Report Share Posted January 18, 2015 Just wanted to report that the RX12 has been working well for me thus far. The range is great!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadoStefanov Posted January 18, 2015 Report Share Posted January 18, 2015 Michael, How is the RF spray from your Nomad? Can you shoot a quick 10 seconds video? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Visser Posted February 15, 2015 Report Share Posted February 15, 2015 I have a question for Glenn or Howy. Would it be possible for the RX12 to incorporate a matrix switcher in than any receiver channel could be assigned to any output? I could imagine a scenario where I would have 12 cast members wired up but only actively mixing half of them in any particular scene and it would be useful to be able to assign them to my mixer inputs, which is less than 12 channels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Visser Posted February 15, 2015 Report Share Posted February 15, 2015 It just occurred to me that an actual matrix switcher would not be required, just a frequency and control scheme paradigm that would allow cast transmitters to be shuttled around on different physical receivers. Cast name/number support would be handy if this were possible to be implemented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Miramontes Posted February 21, 2015 Report Share Posted February 21, 2015 Michael, How is the RF spray from your Nomad? Can you shoot a quick 10 seconds video? Thanks Sorry, I haven't been here for a while. I can post a video later this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Miramontes Posted February 21, 2015 Report Share Posted February 21, 2015 Covers for open slots are on the way soon. Glenn How are those open slot covers coming along? Also, in regards to the RX12 and its advertised functions, it would be great if an RX-12 to Nomad cable* was included with the unit. Or, being given a bit more notice that you would have to make your own in order to take advantage of the RX-12's functionality, more specifically being able to: "Pair the RX-12 with Nomad 10 or Nomad 12 and ZaxNet will re-frequency your transmitters to match with the touch of a button. In addition, the RX-12 and Nomad combo allows for quick and easy TRX gain adjustments." *Special thanks to Wandering Ear for making the custom cable I needed to make this work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vale Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 A question to those that are using a RX12 without a Nomad or QRXIfb... Pairing it with an IFB100/200 for remote controls, is there a way to see the TXs gain? I've just made some tests and (maybe because IFB100/200 have not a serial connection) I was able to change TXs gain, etc, but I not to see that changes reflected on the RX12 display (gain value remains stuck in the same value). So it appeared to me I hadn't a way to see where my TXs gain is set, apart of taking a look at the TXs display... Any ideas? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Hayes Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 I have been using an RX12 for the last 2 weeks for Super CMIT radio booms using the 742 transmitters. We are getting serious range. I am extremely impressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shastapete Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 Simon, are you in single or dual mode with the receivers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd Weaver Posted March 13, 2015 Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 I'll look into making some slot plugs out of silicon rubber. That should seal it up nicely. Once I've got a mold I can make many. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Woodcock Posted March 14, 2015 Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 Who has a 3D printer :-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prahlad Strickland Posted March 14, 2015 Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 I have been using an RX12 for the last 2 weeks for Super CMIT radio booms using the 742 transmitters. We are getting serious range. I am extremely impressed. Are you on shark fins or the likes, or whips?, wondering if the range will be similar to qrx200 + micplex 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd Weaver Posted March 15, 2015 Report Share Posted March 15, 2015 I have been using an RX12 for the last 2 weeks for Super CMIT radio booms using the 742 transmitters. We are getting serious range. I am extremely impressed. What does serious range mean to you? Are you line of sight? Environmental conditions? Distance in feet? Thanks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Miramontes Posted March 17, 2015 Report Share Posted March 17, 2015 I'll look into making some slot plugs out of silicon rubber. That should seal it up nicely. Once I've got a mold I can make many. that would be nice! Kinda bummed out that I have gaff tape cover the empty slots on my expensive piece of gear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vale Posted May 5, 2015 Report Share Posted May 5, 2015 Covers for open slots are on the way soon. Glenn Any news? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.