Ze Frias Posted April 16, 2016 Report Share Posted April 16, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Bacon AMPS Posted April 16, 2016 Report Share Posted April 16, 2016 14 minutes ago, Jose Frias said: Finally a slot-in RX. Now I'm interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shastapete Posted April 17, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 Is the slot in single channel (RX200) or dual channel (QRX200)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismedr Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just now, Shastapete said: Is the slot in single channel (RX200) or dual channel (QRX200)? the label reads "SRX220 Wide-Band 2-Channel ENG Receiver" as far as i can see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ze Frias Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 It only works in single mode like the RX200, so it'll only receive from one transmitter, including the new ZHD, but it will also do stereo modulation from stereo transmitters so it can do two channels of audio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resonate Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 5 hours ago, Jose Frias said: It only works in single mode like the RX200, so it'll only receive from one transmitter, including the new ZHD, but it will also do stereo modulation from stereo transmitters so it can do two channels of audio. so it cannot receive audio from two different talent ZHD transmitters,right? Is there any option for that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VASI Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 Is the SRX220 compatibility with SL-6? ...and right now I just killed the English grammar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ze Frias Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 1 hour ago, resonate said: so it cannot receive audio from two different talent ZHD transmitters,right? Is there any option for that? Correct. Currently there's no receiver that will work in dual mode with two ZHD transmitters. Once NAB is over, they'll be able to better determine if it's possible to make dual mode work with ZHD on the current 4-channel receivers (QRX200, 235, 212) in the future. 26 minutes ago, VAS said: Is the SRX220 compatibility with SL-6? ...and right now I just killed the English grammar SRX220 is super slot and SL-6 compatible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Sonnenfeld Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 Anyone hear anything about Wisycom? Hoping for some new firmware and wondering if they will have a hardware upgrade for MTP41 to MTP41s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VASI Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 688, SL-6, Zaxcom TRXLT3, SRX220: Best combo out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Sonnenfeld Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 36 minutes ago, VAS said: 688, SL-6, Zaxcom TRXLT3, SRX220: Best combo out there. I was starting to look very critically at my Wisycom and think the same thing but the SRX220 being single channel (excluding stereo modulation) is a deal breaker for me. That means only 3 channels through SL-6. I'll keep watching the development for sure though. I believe very strongly in standardization, especially open standards like SuperSlot and I find it very encouraging and exciting to see Zaxcom joining the standard. I asked Glenn a few months back when he did a Gotham Sound Livestream if he would consider joining SuperSlot and I'm thrilled to see it come true. A dual channel SuperSlot rx, let's call it SQRX220, might just have me on board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Tresch Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 19 hours ago, RadoStefanov said: Some very cool things coming from MozeGear as well. Check them out. Yes Please test the 2XG and the minijack output as it could be interesting for a lot of small cameras! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ze Frias Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 1 hour ago, Matthew Sonnenfeld said: I was starting to look very critically at my Wisycom and think the same thing but the SRX220 being single channel (excluding stereo modulation) is a deal breaker for me. That means only 3 channels through SL-6. I'll keep watching the development for sure though. I believe very strongly in standardization, especially open standards like SuperSlot and I find it very encouraging and exciting to see Zaxcom joining the standard. I asked Glenn a few months back when he did a Gotham Sound Livestream if he would consider joining SuperSlot and I'm thrilled to see it come true. A dual channel SuperSlot rx, let's call it SQRX220, might just have me on board. It was the most they could fit into a slot form for a fully digital RF system. There's still quite a few good uses even with the single transmitter limitation. For SuperCMIT users, a TRX742/3 with the AES42 cone will transmit both channels to the SRX220. The Camera Link will also transmit two channels and timecode to this receiver for a great camera hop system. Or if you need one channel of zaxcom wireless with ZHD and transmitter recording. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Sonnenfeld Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 23 minutes ago, Jose Frias said: It was the most they could fit into a slot form for a fully digital RF system. Yet! Absolutely a whole host of great uses for the SRX220. Just not the ones that I would be needing them for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Bacon AMPS Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 1 hour ago, Jose Frias said: It was the most they could fit into a slot form for a fully digital RF system. There's still quite a few good uses even with the single transmitter limitation. For SuperCMIT users, a TRX742/3 with the AES42 cone will transmit both channels to the SRX220. The Camera Link will also transmit two channels and timecode to this receiver for a great camera hop system. Or if you need one channel of zaxcom wireless with ZHD and transmitter recording. How do you access the second channel when used as a hop? Is there a 5-pin output option? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ze Frias Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 34 minutes ago, Matt Bacon AMPS said: How do you access the second channel when used as a hop? Is there a 5-pin output option? There is no 5-pin output option a la SRb5bp that I'm aware of if that's what you mean. If you're referring to using it with cameras with the built in unislot, I personally don't have any experience with this receiver yet, so maybe Jack or Glenn can chime in. I do know that it will work with current slot receiver accessories like the Ambient VSLOT, etc. This receiver will also do AES, so if the camera has AES inputs, that's also an alternative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Tresch Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 Hello, Pierre Blanc from Sonosax will be present at NAB prensenting the new Sonosax SX-R4+ modular concept and accessories and also the wonderful SX-ST and SX-62R. Booth C5047 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTA Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 4 hours ago, Matthew Sonnenfeld said: I was starting to look very critically at my Wisycom and think the same thing but the SRX220 being single channel (excluding stereo modulation) is a deal breaker for me. That means only 3 channels through SL-6. I'll keep watching the development for sure though. I believe very strongly in standardization, especially open standards like SuperSlot and I find it very encouraging and exciting to see Zaxcom joining the standard. I asked Glenn a few months back when he did a Gotham Sound Livestream if he would consider joining SuperSlot and I'm thrilled to see it come true. A dual channel SuperSlot rx, let's call it SQRX220, might just have me on board. I was thinking the same thing. There are definitely a bunch of good uses for the SRx! But I also think that if it were able to receive 2 mono channels or a new version of it was able to, (even if it only was half of the current wideband, say 20-23 & 24-26 like their Tx's) I think it would open Zaxcom up to a bigger market of people who already own SL-6's, or just mixers looking to keep their bag as small as possible with the most amount of wireless channels. Dual Rxs seem to be in high demand for the bag these days. Especially in this time when people are looking to get their bags as small as possible while also having a lot of wireless channels to manage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadoStefanov Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 23 hours ago, PalmerT said: I was thinking the same thing. There are definitely a bunch of good uses for the SRx! But I also think that if it were able to receive 2 mono channels or a new version of it was able to, (even if it only was half of the current wideband, say 20-23 & 24-26 like their Tx's) I think it would open Zaxcom up to a bigger market of people who already own SL-6's, or just mixers looking to keep their bag as small as possible with the most amount of wireless channels. Dual Rxs seem to be in high demand for the bag these days. Especially in this time when people are looking to get their bags as small as possible while also having a lot of wireless channels to manage. Stacking single receivers will use more power and take more space then duals. I don't see people buying them for SL6 considering they can only use 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Norflus Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 On 4/14/2016 at 5:03 PM, Glen Deakin said: So is the range like double the Hudson test that was done with the previous modulation? You would need to a db25 to xlr with time code cable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTA Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 30 minutes ago, RadoStefanov said: Stacking single receivers will use more power and take more space the duals. I don't see people buying them for SL6 considering they can only use 3. Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent R. Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lyrnxG Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 I would like to see a "SL-6B". A device that can daisy chain 3 more super slot compatible receivers in for a total of 6 RX, 12 channels wireless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadoStefanov Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 30 minutes ago, lyrnxG said: I would like to see a "SL-6B". A device that can daisy chain 3 more super slot compatible receivers in for a total of 6 RX, 12 channels wireless. sounds good and if it is also stand alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerard-NYNY Posted April 18, 2016 Report Share Posted April 18, 2016 i love it. sign me up. http://www.mozegear.com/#!mini-papi/c1v8a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.279748a58a2b862b7aa5f3b84126e232.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.