Jump to content

SQN history


Rob Braxton

Recommended Posts

I am interested for this as well. While their mixers are not the cheapest, they are absolutely second to anyone about building and sound quality.

I liked the sound of the SQNs, but was warned off them years ago when they were having trouble servicing them in the western USA.

Maybe that's changed, they still seem kind of expensive compared to the SD stuff.  Many  many years ago I had Jim Tannenbaum himself tell me that the SQNs were the only small mixers around that were suitable for feature film sound.  That was before SD and the Cooper 104, but a pretty good endorsement nonetheless.  (I couldn't afford it though.)

Philip Perkins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've always run into RF issues with the 3-4 different SQN's series 2-4, I've used. I would pick up the occasional radio station through the boom mic. Drove me crazy. No matter where I stood, it would be there, and I never figured out what the common location elements caused it(ie. transformers, power lines, etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...