Jump to content

Patrick Tresch

Members
  • Posts

    518
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Patrick Tresch

  1. 45 minutes ago, bigidibo said:

     

    I think they share the same design in MD2D..? Which I really love as a tool. Next-level DAC and preamps.

     

     

     

    The M2D2 is totally another tech based on dual AD (that came out before Zaxcom's and is a bit different). The M2D2 is really close to the AD8+ preamp and R4+ recorder series wich have a bit less compromise due to more power draw capability. The SX-ST VT is 100% analog no AD conversion before EQ. As there is no AD there is no need of a dual AD structure. Still the best for a battery powered audio preamp and mixer.

  2. For music lovers there is also the SX-VT line wich has rare specs :

    "Wide bandwidth10Hz to 200kHz, suitable for SACD and next converters generations"

     

    Sonosax pream use proprietary tech than others and permits such a wide bandwidth.

    People love to speak about 32bit headroom but first you have to get some sound to record. 😉 

     

    Patrick

  3. Hello,

     

    I'm looking for a sound report software that isn't Wave agent wich is great for a start but  there is a lack of features and it need a lift up. 

     

    Any ideas. Would love to enven buy a license if there is a new tool in development.

     

    Patrick

     

  4. 7 minutes ago, Axel Mishael said:

    How did you convinced the DP to put such a weight (on the other hand a "camera mic" never sounded better).

     

    I'm the DP 😉 

    I usually use the CCM41&CCM8. I prefer a stereo (MS) PoV of the camera.

    IMHO it's not too heavy.

     

    Patrick

  5. 21 hours ago, RadoStefanov said:


    my workflow  is If the camera sound is required for a legitimate reason  " short turn around" the camera operator should listen. 
    not if you are doing seat down interviews a snake with return is a must. 
     

    IMHO the sound is the sound dep responsability. Even checking for problems on the camera sound, metering, updating softwares and chansing bugs, or declare : it's not yet a tool to record sound.

  6. On 5/1/2024 at 12:50 AM, Phillip C Dent said:

    I just worked with the AEM-1 yesterday and got burned. I set my audio input to aes in, but when the camera power cycled it reset to mic in and phantom power on.  So the audio for the interview did not get recorded on the camera. I had the audio on the b cam and my 664 and everything was jammed, but I had to have the fun conversation of letting production know that there was no audio on the A Cam. 
     

    I also did not put my Lectro M2R on the camera as a hop when we went into Verite mode, so as not to fry it again.

     

    I’ll pass on the firmware update to the owner of the camera.

     

    For the record the software of the AEM-1 is made by Arri (and not Sonosax).

  7. On 6/24/2024 at 8:52 PM, Jeff Wexler said:

    As far as I can tell, Rode will lose just as Lerctro lost. The patents are solid whether you agree with them or not. Defending the patent is no fun at all but necessary for any company that holds patents that presupposed to prevent other companies from stealing. The legal costs are substantial and obviously hurts Zaxcom ore than Rode (Rode is a billion dollar business). No matter what the legal costs are, it has to be done, it will be settled in court and Rode will have to wait like every other company until the patents expire. Of course if Rode agrees to a licensing fee (something which many, many other companies have had to do to produce products that are deemed to infringe), they would be able to legally manufacture and sell a recording transmitter.

    Or ignore the USA market.

×
×
  • Create New...