Jump to content

osa

Members
  • Content Count

    660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About osa

  • Rank
    sound chaser
  • Birthday January 1

Profile Information

  • Location
    cincinnati
  • About
    sound mixer in the midwest region
  • Interested in Sound for Picture
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

3,268 profile views
  1. osa

    Nova iso attenuation

    Ha ha while i am at it was there any mention on the face book about “error store (1)” when attempting to store presets? I feel like I’ve gone through pretty extensive testing so far and that’s the only other snag I ran into. It would say error in store (1) No matter which of the three store slots I attempted to save. But I did have success saving one to the mirror card.
  2. osa

    Nova iso attenuation

    Thank you. I wish we could port that Facebook group over here for those of us who don’t use Facebook
  3. Curious to know if other Nova owners are using iso attenuation successfully. i dont recall this item being discussed as of late. I uncovered what might be a glitch with my unit v1.50 unless i am missing something. With attenuation set to off, everything appears to function as normal. when i engage -6dB or more to any or all iso tracks, i lose audio from any inputs assigned to tracks, but the output assigned to tracks stays in place but does not show attenuation at any level. i can still mix inputs to outputs. when i set back to off everything returns to the tracks record enabled, but the faders remain "up" and have to be turned down to reactivate fader control recorded test and brought into pro tools - image below shows how iso attenuation engaged mid recording seems to cause audio to disappear but only tracks with inputs assigned - digital or analog - and when turned off mid recording audio returns normal. leaving attenuation option off for now. i will call zaxom when i get a chance but wanted to see if there is anything crazy i am missing? -Ken
  4. Thank you rado i am inspired... Front pouch for hi q batt works perfect This below was my previous rig that i thought was compact Whoa what a difference
  5. ran tests today - the only way i could consistently reproduce this problem is BDS powering all units at the same time. rarely the CL would timestamp correctly. only files on micro SD were affected, not files on lav transmitters receiving tc from CL. once i powered maxx unswitched and powered first allowing to boot up full it seemed to fix this problem
  6. This was odd behavior that happened today. i wanted to provide a client with an entire recording of an event for backup purposes. TC is jamming regularly like normal. i was able to pull the file into protools and use another file from the recorder to restamp tc. the last file in the list below is me putting the card back in and suddenly the tc stamped properly? zaxcom maxx and CL block 22
  7. +1 I also like being able to cable the headphone jack to the other side of the recorder and have external access
  8. Wow that is an amazing example. Really puts it into perspective
  9. Thank you for clarifying – not a dealbreaker by any means but certainly good to know
  10. Am I understanding correctly That by design this would support 4x ZHD 48 mode transmitters?
  11. I know july was a pipe dream for delivery but has anyone other than Rado put their hands on one of their very own as of yet? I have been saving my lunch money since april
  12. osa

    Zaxcom Nova FAQ

    • Will the Nova support Oasis and Mix16? It will support Oasis but not mix 16 just curious is Oasis supported by the nova upon initial release or is this support coming in the near to not to distant future?
  13. I had been following your “6 pounds development” since its inception and this is incredible fruit of your labors. Great review
  14. my first experience with block 23. my qrx200 is skipping past block 23 as an option for limit scans. i was in the middle of trying to help a friend of mine pair a block 23/24 kit for his job. the trx's allowed me to select block 23 frequencies. i see some devices for sale from time to time in block 23 it was my understanding it was limited use i.e ch37 blocked as per lectro doc below. is the whole block not meant to be used at all in the U.S. at present? https://www.lectrosonics.com/images/PDFs/TV-Channels-Frequencies-blocks.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...