Jump to content

pono arrives


Jeff Wexler

Recommended Posts

Mr Young has for decades listened to his songs and those of his contemporaries in the control room of the recording studio.

 

And the pond outside his barn. As Graham Nash tells Terry Gross during an interview:

 

TERRY GROSS: In the acknowledgements to your book, where you're praising your friends and your family, you describe Neil Young as, quote, "the strangest of my friends."

NASH: He is.

GROSS: What makes him strange?

NASH: The man is totally committed to the muse of music. And he'll do anything for good music. And sometimes it's very strange. I was at Neil's ranch one day just south of San Francisco, and he has a beautiful lake with red-wing blackbirds. And he asked me if I wanted to hear his new album, "Harvest." And I said sure, let's go into the studio and listen.

Oh, no. That's not what Neil had in mind. He said get into the rowboat.

(LAUGHTER)

NASH: I said get into the rowboat? He said, yeah, we're going to go out into the middle of the lake. Now, I think he's got a little cassette player with him or a little, you know, early digital format player. You know, so I'm thinking I'm going to wear headphones and listen in the relative peace of the middle of Neil's lake.

Oh, no. He has the - his entire house as the left speaker and his entire barn as the right speaker. And I heard "Harvest" coming out of these two incredibly large speakers louder than hell. It was unbelievable. Elliot Mazer, who produced Neil, produced "Harvest," came down to the shore of the lake and he shouted out to Neil: How was that, Neil?

And I swear to god, Neil Young shouted back: More barn!

 

You can listen to, read, and gloss the interview here:

http://www.npr.org/2013/12/25/256590871/graham-nash-has-wild-tales-to-spare

 

 

"Pono: It's like a Toblerone-shaped barn in your pocket."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flawed experiment, refuted in many places, e.g.

http://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=1497

That article is flawed as well, as it dismisses the entire study based on the worst recording, completely ignoring all the of SACD content because of a low pass filter.

While he is right that for the test to be complete, there has to be the accurate recording and playback of the entire frequency content and dynamic range capable of being recorded by high resolution (96khz max frequency content, 144dB dynamic range), I don't believe the equipment is available to do so.

That is to say that every electronic part in the recording chain would have to allow high frequency content to be passed through unadulterated. Most equipment rolls off to 20khz. Some speakers would be destroyed by the higher frequency content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of it is a buncha hooey, but I have to say, I'm glad about the idea of allowing people to download uncompressed lossless music, which is a good thing. Empty-three's don't do anybody any good. And at least it's an opportunity for musicians and record labels to make more money in these difficult times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...