jon_tatooles Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Folks, We have posted new firmware for the 633 and 664 mixers: 633 - http://www.sounddevices.com/download/633-firmware/ 664 - http://www.sounddevices.com/download/664-firmware/ The full change list is just a link away. Happy Firmware Friday! Jon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Perkins Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Thanks, SD dudes! philp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siddho Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 faaaar out! just updated my 633. support now for Transcend SDHC Class 10 SD cards!!! i have a bunch of these and they are cheap as chips. and L/R can be mirrored to XI & X2. and loads more.... thanks a million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Davies Amps CAS Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 faaaar out! just updated my 633. support now for Transcend SDHC Class 10 SD cards!!! i have a bunch of these and they are cheap as chips. Good news but what speed are approved and are so cheap? Anything above 400mb/s is like Germany's national debt to buy here in the UK Malcolm Davies A.m.p.s. CAS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siddho Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 good point Malcolm! i am assuming (wrongly?) they mean the premium range 133x which have codes ending with "SDHC10". the faster ones (300x and 600x) have codes ending with U1. also the 133x are the only ones which dont have a speed rating on the cards themselves which might mean that is why SD - if they did indeed choose them - didnt include a speed rating for these on their list. i tried a 133x for a quick polywav test and it worked, but who knows! maybe someone from SD will clarify? have sent them a support request on this. will post here if and when i get a reply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomboom Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 ... Coming soon: UHS Class cards ... In which class 3 will go something like 280mbps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siddho Posted March 3, 2014 Report Share Posted March 3, 2014 just heard back from SD about the Transcend cards. its as i thought!! :-) Quote from the email i received: The Transcend SD card we approved is the Transcend SDHC Premium. These cards do not show a speed rating. I'm including the link to the card on Transcend's website as well as Amazon."http://www.transcend-info.com/products/Catlist.asp?ModNo=337http://www.amazon.com/Transcend-Class-Flash-Memory-TS8GSDHC10E/dp/B003VNKNEG/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1393867465&sr=8-4&keywords=transcend+sdhc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulluysavage Posted June 8, 2014 Report Share Posted June 8, 2014 Suggestion for 633/664: in the sound reports, have the option to report L/R and X1,X2 track names when the tracks aren't recorded. Also be able to rename L/R and X1,X2 column headers. When I am sending to multiple cameras, I don't necessarily record L/R X1/X2 tracks, maybe just isos. But I still want to report what I've recorded on each camera. This would make it easy. Example: on 633, send L/R to camera A and X1,X2 to camera B. Name L and X1 "Lav" and R and X2 "Boom". Rename column headers as follows: L= "Camera A Ch1" R="Camera A Ch2" Track1(X1)="Camera B Ch1" Track2(X2)="Camera B Ch2" Of course I could do this all after the fact if I started bringing my laptop, but I would love to leave it at home and have the 633 keep track for me. If there are many different configurations on a given shoot, this takes away a layer of things to keep track of. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_bollard Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 The report only covers tracks (ISOs recorded) - if the track is not recorded there is no metadata from which to create the report. You will need to fall back to old school paper reports to cover these additional un-recorded sends Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulluysavage Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 The report only covers tracks (ISOs recorded) - if the track is not recorded there is no metadata from which to create the report. You will need to fall back to old school paper reports to cover these additional un-recorded sends I know. I am suggesting a feature change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiomprd Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 savage: " I am suggesting a feature change. " have you posted that on the SD forum ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulluysavage Posted June 10, 2014 Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 savage: " I am suggesting a feature change. " have you posted that on the SD forum ?? Good idea!! Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_bollard Posted June 10, 2014 Report Share Posted June 10, 2014 I know. I am suggesting a feature change. Sorry but my point is you can't create a report from metadata that's not there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundslikejustin Posted June 14, 2014 Report Share Posted June 14, 2014 Are you providing those iso's at the end of the day, or emailing the report? In any case, make a separate note of what's on each camera and send it with the report/files. I can't imagine SD implementing a feature like that (for files that aren't being recorded)... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Constantin Posted June 15, 2014 Report Share Posted June 15, 2014 On the 788T at least there is a notes section in the sound reports menu. You could enter you camera track assignment there and it would show up at the top of each daily report. Maybe the 633 has something similar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_bollard Posted June 16, 2014 Report Share Posted June 16, 2014 (edited) Yes 633 does. But it would be faster and more understandable if done in a standard form on a piece of paper. Also may have problem with maximum number of characters.... Edited June 16, 2014 by chris_bollard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.279748a58a2b862b7aa5f3b84126e232.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.